Okay, gish gallops are cool and all, but without evidence that hasnt been debunked i frankly dont care

DEBONKED

I DONT CARE TO LOOK INTO ANYTHING WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE

Chill watch the video

It would be awfully bad if it proved you wrong

wouldn't it

https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c

Unlucky

"medium"

ahh, fake news cause it disagrees with u

Okay well guess im done here

He still doesn't follow benford's law lmao

I can write an article and publish it on medium right now lol

yeah, the point is for u to read the article as this isnt the only article giving backlash to this guy

I forgot in the constitution where it says "If benfords law is not followed election must be fraudulent"

Benford's law is an indicator of fraud lol

This is old shit thats been debunked months ago

The defense was "voter dumps" right?

He says in the article he didn't go through the data himself

So what's the point of that

oh it "could be misleading"

https://physicsworld.com/a/benfords-law-and-the-2020-us-presidential-election-nothing-out-of-the-ordinary/

Change the c in your name to s

Because the guy who suggested it can be used in fraud

said it doesn't seem out of the ordinary

<:cryingbugman:738000461386350653>

therefore it didn't happen

Pedophile

I love journalists based in Madrid with a masters in Science Communication how credible

If u knew how to read im sure you'd be able to identify why it doesnt apply for reasons other than "it said so"

yeah?

That is literally the defense lmao

Okay

"In this paper I study a statistical method intended to help detect election fraud. Other methods, using regression-based techniques for outlier detection,have previously been proposed to help detect election anomalie"

When his method is applied in this scenario

It comes back with the same rate of detection

but now he is right because he said no?

If you think about it the brain named itself 🤯

If you think about it no one cares