@MrDefault Being gay wouldn't have to bred out, because there isn't necessarily a "gay gene" in the direct sense

There could be a gene that causes homosexuality in certain circumstances

there are much larger issues but this is something that we will have to deal with

@Jacob 🤔 got any actual studies for this?

It causes more effeminity. Not necessarily "gay" gene

I think homosexuality is a major issue tbh. Personally, it seems from a moral perspective, but we can't exactly save our demographics if we permit lifestyles that don't create children

No, not as far as I know. It's just a potential explanation for why it *could* be genetic, not something that has been proven @MrDefault

@Nico The Great - CA agreed

@PatrickAZ Dude again you can’t generalize like that. I know very manly masculine football players and hockey players who are gay and you would never ever guess in a million years that they are.

That's why I was careful not to say that it's necessarily true

If you are able to take a pounding you are effeminate. the act of desiring a phallus is feminine.

I wonder if there is a correlation between homosexual leanings vs. divorced/single parents

The drastic drop in birth rate among white people is not due to homosexuality. It’s due to the feminists and straight couples who choose not to have kids

They could be outwardly "masculine" but when you get down to the nitty gritty they are desiring the phallus.

@Grayson agreed.

@Jacob Dopamine receptors are very fragile and can be rewired given the right stimuli. If positive association is given to being gay or gay traits added dopamine release you can wire the brain.

There is also the increased use of plastics for food items starting mid 20th century, chemical exposure?

Yes but the problem is that accepting ANY behavior not conducive to families always leads to the acceptance of others. The slippery slope is real

@PatrickAZ Lol Sorry but one is taking the pounding and one is doing the pounding and they’re both gay LOL

@Grayson both are desiring the phallus.

@wolfwood Gay frogs is unironically true

@MrDefault I'm sure what you're saying is true. After all, every trait is a combination of genetics *and* environment.

and I said if you are able.

I think one thing we need to acknowledge is that increasing birth rates isn't an inherent good. There's some people who are better off not breeding.

@Jacob my original point being was if it was purely genetic we wouldn’t have the rate of homosexuality we currently have.

lol fair

@MrDefault sure, of course it isn't purely genetic, I don't any trait is

A big issue is that you can't always have these rigid definitions of human sexuality - putting them into formidable identities. That's not how human nature works

oy vey.

"Dopamine receptors are very fragile and can be rewired given the right stimuli. If positive association is given to being gay or gay traits added dopamine release you can wire the brain."

^ This would appear true based on the studies and presentations of one particular doctor that presented findings to the US senate. I forget her name but she had research showing how formerly straight men "became" gay after being meth addicts. The long and short of it was that they did gay stuff for meth > brains became rewired to associate gay stuff with meth high.

@@Jason - CT I don't think so. Nature has made men and women compatible. Anything outside of this is unnatural

How will gays ever recover

@Nico The Great - CA this guy

@Grayson true birth rates are due to that

I used to think being gay was 100% something determined before/during birth, but I do not think so anymore based on what gays have told me and what I've read since.

@PatrickAZ Sorry bro ha ha, but I have to lay down the law

that's what I am saying too.

Reward unnatural behavior, get unnatural behavior

Every single homosexual I have met that I've had the opportunity to speak with frankly has admitted to being the victim of sexual abuse

That's why any public policy should reward starting natural, healthy family structures

and to think that this entire big brained discussion is due to some shitpost I made about the 6th Political Theory