Message from @wolfwood

Discord ID: 531688336482631680


2019-01-07 04:14:36 UTC  

no, it wouldn't necessarily have to have been bred out

2019-01-07 04:14:42 UTC  

let me find my post from earlier

2019-01-07 04:14:44 UTC  

^

2019-01-07 04:15:04 UTC  

@MrDefault agreed

2019-01-07 04:15:12 UTC  

There’s plenty of low IQ white trash people who live in trailers but they are our people . Anyways no I’m not suggesting that we need to open our arms to minorities and illegals and refugees and other races. But I agree with Jakob that we have bigger fish to fry than getting all flustered and obsessed with gay issues

2019-01-07 04:15:24 UTC  

Gay men are often obsessed with trying to please other men, because their father was distant, absent, abusive, etc growing up.

2019-01-07 04:15:30 UTC  

Agreed.

2019-01-07 04:15:34 UTC  

@wolfwood agreed

2019-01-07 04:15:50 UTC  

@Grayson I am not trying to get into nonsense.

2019-01-07 04:15:57 UTC  

@MrDefault Being gay wouldn't have to bred out, because there isn't necessarily a "gay gene" in the direct sense

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481597551272001546/531687414150725648/screenshot-discordapp.com-2019.01.06-20-15-09.png

2019-01-07 04:16:15 UTC  

There could be a gene that causes homosexuality in certain circumstances

2019-01-07 04:16:20 UTC  

there are much larger issues but this is something that we will have to deal with

2019-01-07 04:16:50 UTC  

@Jacob 🤔 got any actual studies for this?

2019-01-07 04:16:57 UTC  

It causes more effeminity. Not necessarily "gay" gene

2019-01-07 04:17:23 UTC  

I think homosexuality is a major issue tbh. Personally, it seems from a moral perspective, but we can't exactly save our demographics if we permit lifestyles that don't create children

2019-01-07 04:17:44 UTC  

No, not as far as I know. It's just a potential explanation for why it *could* be genetic, not something that has been proven @MrDefault

2019-01-07 04:17:48 UTC  
2019-01-07 04:17:53 UTC  

@PatrickAZ Dude again you can’t generalize like that. I know very manly masculine football players and hockey players who are gay and you would never ever guess in a million years that they are.

2019-01-07 04:18:13 UTC  

That's why I was careful not to say that it's necessarily true

2019-01-07 04:19:11 UTC  

If you are able to take a pounding you are effeminate. the act of desiring a phallus is feminine.

2019-01-07 04:19:37 UTC  

I wonder if there is a correlation between homosexual leanings vs. divorced/single parents

2019-01-07 04:19:44 UTC  

The drastic drop in birth rate among white people is not due to homosexuality. It’s due to the feminists and straight couples who choose not to have kids

2019-01-07 04:20:07 UTC  

They could be outwardly "masculine" but when you get down to the nitty gritty they are desiring the phallus.

2019-01-07 04:20:18 UTC  

@Grayson agreed.

2019-01-07 04:20:22 UTC  

@Jacob Dopamine receptors are very fragile and can be rewired given the right stimuli. If positive association is given to being gay or gay traits added dopamine release you can wire the brain.

2019-01-07 04:20:27 UTC  

There is also the increased use of plastics for food items starting mid 20th century, chemical exposure?

2019-01-07 04:20:31 UTC  

Yes but the problem is that accepting ANY behavior not conducive to families always leads to the acceptance of others. The slippery slope is real

2019-01-07 04:20:34 UTC  

@PatrickAZ Lol Sorry but one is taking the pounding and one is doing the pounding and they’re both gay LOL

2019-01-07 04:21:00 UTC  

@Grayson both are desiring the phallus.

2019-01-07 04:21:06 UTC  

@wolfwood Gay frogs is unironically true

2019-01-07 04:21:17 UTC  

@MrDefault I'm sure what you're saying is true. After all, every trait is a combination of genetics *and* environment.

2019-01-07 04:21:56 UTC  

and I said if you are able.

2019-01-07 04:22:15 UTC  

I think one thing we need to acknowledge is that increasing birth rates isn't an inherent good. There's some people who are better off not breeding.

2019-01-07 04:22:28 UTC  

@Jacob my original point being was if it was purely genetic we wouldn’t have the rate of homosexuality we currently have.

2019-01-07 04:22:29 UTC  

lol fair

2019-01-07 04:22:50 UTC  

@MrDefault sure, of course it isn't purely genetic, I don't any trait is

2019-01-07 04:22:54 UTC  

A big issue is that you can't always have these rigid definitions of human sexuality - putting them into formidable identities. That's not how human nature works

2019-01-07 04:23:21 UTC  

oy vey.

2019-01-07 04:23:27 UTC  

"Dopamine receptors are very fragile and can be rewired given the right stimuli. If positive association is given to being gay or gay traits added dopamine release you can wire the brain."

^ This would appear true based on the studies and presentations of one particular doctor that presented findings to the US senate. I forget her name but she had research showing how formerly straight men "became" gay after being meth addicts. The long and short of it was that they did gay stuff for meth > brains became rewired to associate gay stuff with meth high.

2019-01-07 04:24:06 UTC  

@@Jason - CT I don't think so. Nature has made men and women compatible. Anything outside of this is unnatural

2019-01-07 04:24:20 UTC  

How will gays ever recover