Maybe it wasn't forgotten it's just unknown to most.

I disagree about the contengent election. To count it out now would mean you have information I have not seen yet. Those suits may not directly lead to a contengent election but they could reasonably lead to one if there is no ajudication in the near future on these claims and the legislatures choose to withold electors. I still maintain the most prudent stance is that either option is equally possible at the moment. I am happy to hear your evendence though and if you decide to answer my previously standing question. Thanks for your time!

It could be likely if the certification of the electoral results remain in dispute all the way up to Jan 6th when congress holds the new session

I find that very likely.

Or if enough legislators decide the well is polluted, we are not transmitting these results to the electoral college.

If Biden gets his 270, only for Trump to take the Inauguration, I don't imagine things will be civil at all.

The CCP does a lot of land reclamation tearing up contracts and tearing everyone's House down and reselling the property.

@Recalibar It will arguably end worse.

either he will be present, or he'll host a rally elsewhere in D.C on the same day

gearing up for a 2024 run

and Biden will already face a lot of challenges coming into office, because most of the people who voted for him, simply did it to vote against Trump.

He's lame duck from day 1.

So yes.

Well the GOP only needs to win one seat in GA runoff, the Dems need both. I like those odds

State actors and state sponsored actors have a lot more wherewithal, orders of magnitude more capability when it comes to being offensively exploitive.

Agreed. This is why I think if there's really a massive cyberwarfare attack on the US going on, targeting the election software systems like is being alleged, particularly during these hearings by the good Coronel presenting all these vectors of attack, we need to have this resolved and fast.

I don't think he said it was a cyberware attack

I believe he mentioned Iran and China by name.

only that data packets were moving in and out of the country from those machines

@Corndog that’s because like I said you take the position that the election needs to be proven to be non fraudulent otherwise it’s not legitimate in your mind. If this becomes a contingent election all the losing party in the future has to do is have enough delegates in the house to overturn a election. Keep in mind not a shred of fraud was proven. This sets up a bad precedent. This was actually one of the main topics a while back. Can you as a losing president just make stuff up until it gets to the house.

To servers hosted by Dominion internationally

More likely China but Iran has a big boned pick as well. Iran doesn't have the human assets that China has in the US or the ability to control .

Man, sure sucks dems made it only take 51 votes for congress.

Just sayin'

:)

senate*

Servers hosted in AWS in Germany?

Lame duck if the senate doesn’t flip. @Maw

yes, but nothing established about them manipulating data remotely.

R n r pdf book . Is in the server.. why he post it

The only red flag was that dominion workers said they weren't connected to the internet, but they were,

I find it interesting CNN says we should be concerned with an Iran war over assassinations of important key figures via drone strike.

@MatiLuc Because as he's said many times, it's an incentive to join the discord and he wants to help give back to the community.

Actually I would argue technically they were not connected to the internet as previously described by me.

But they were in fact connected into aws's virtual private Network structure technically not an internet connection.

Iran won’t go to war. The US won’t get international backing either.

I have never taken that position, I already clarified that now twice. You are welcome to point out what is causing you to think that. Otherwise it is clear we are at an intellectual impasse, aside from me setting next to you and explaining in real time I don’t think you and I personally are going to get anywhere else with this discussion. Thanks for your time and effort’s hopefully everyone else will benefit as much as I have from reading through our communication. 🙂

And why are you watching cnn?

@Maw thanks.. will read it tomorrow

Same reason Bannon has CNN playing in the background when he live streams the war room.

@MatiLuc Welcome, it's a good read.