Its good to know ill still take that threat seriously though even with so much flinging of poop (House Representatives + media pundits)

That was a good brake check moment.

Can you provide a different form of screenshot. That's not readable.

Poor quality but just readable
Para 2 item b

Solarwinds -Netflow traffic analyser- enables a company to collect historical data of global network traffic. Historical information is collected for network traffic dating back months, even years.It will for instance save all the traffic that took place on the entire companies network during November 3rd and 4th, between source and destination, IP Address, (different servers, between Frankfurt, Barcelona, Atlanta for instance). Time stamps, amount of data, in simple terms it stores every conversion of every system talking to every system over the companies global network.

Trying to get a better copy for you

@SoonMrWick I agree... plus at this point it could literally be anyone.. So I’d say it’s silly to rule anyone out just yet.

Yeah, no. Totally retracting again 😅

Someone of authority should spread that kind of info, at this point.

This guy covers its , watch the first 10 minutes
https://youtu.be/wmBGQnLYNt8

@Britinvietnam, you just advanced to level 2!

I can sense his frustration, and it's valid IMO, But this is crazy technical that will not be believed at face value at all. Serious accusations take serious proof. And there's been some serious shenanigans.

okay, so he's reading this. https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report

Tons of people are dismissing it on partisanship immediately because of the messenger. I'm more concerned about the message.

Because of the one doing the “audit” not the messenger

No one on that team had the first clue how to evaluate a voting machine

That’s why ramsland just repeated what he has been saying for years

If they actually did a audit they would have something to show for it

Step 1. We think the machine is bad

Step 2. Repeat the same nonsense I have been saying for years with no new added information

Heres hoping the fbi find the data traffic transfer overseas on the solarwinds machines, and have the patriotism to state all what they find

This guy (previous interview) https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A

Same guy same story , same bs artist

Hey, James know-it-all is awake. Hi James.

They claimed in the hearing that they captured packets that went from the machine to the Internet

What ever happened to that tall tale

Bye James.

@SoonMrWick I don’t sleep also how can you take that “report” seriously

It’s just a stated claim and then a rehashing of the same conclusion that guy had years ago. (Which btw is yet another claim with no evidence)

Sleep is good for the soul.

Good morning! 🌞 It’s still election month. It’s like ground hog day.

Election ended yesterday

Now it’s just ceremony

You didn't even watch the video of the guys platform you're on. Amazing.

I haven’t watched his videos for weeks

The election is over

https://github.com/fireeye/red_team_tool_countermeasures

Okay some more thoughts on this paper. Towards the bottom they compare their model with other models claiming, of course, that their model is better. Wait there are other models? Yes and what do those models say? Well they agree on the places where cheating didn't occur but disagree with the model in the paper on these places where cheating supposedly did occur according to the model in the paper. So this paper model is better because it found cheating. Well they don't say that. They claim their model is better because their model is built on the entire US and in the critique of another model they say this "These five states are not similar, they are idiosyncratic in some respect ..." referring to the five states their model predicts fraud. This is similar to what I said in previous comments. So while they apply this logic to criticize another that compares counties in these states to similar counties in other states, they themselves build this model based off of all counties, recognize these states are idiosyncratic nevertheless apply their model. Sorry can't have this both ways. What is a criticism of one model is even a bigger criticism of the model in this paper. They repeat something like this in their conclusion, saying that either AZ, GA, PA etc. are totally unlike the rest of the country or fraud. Wait didn't they argue that these states "are idiosyncratic in some respect" when comparing their model to another? Sorry can't have it both ways.

Lol. Bro.

https://github.com/fireeye

I appreciate your feedback. I hadn't heard of this site before and it clearly looked as though it was looking through the lens of a predetermined outcome.