Message from @JD~Jordan
Discord ID: 793571602876989471
you removed both
Ok.
that is a link
I didnt write that word
No, but it's still not SFW, they have it in their link.
can u guys take this to the private chat
But because you were defending that very group earlier its very disingenuous to remove the link on the pretext of an objectionable word
I can't allow that PARTICULAR link to be posted.
lol what a fucking joke
ugh
For real, if you'd like, you can converse with me in private about this, but this really isn't the place for discussion about me personally. This is a channel for everyone to engage in.
nah. Im done. Can be a legit discussion when someone is freely censoring the opposition to their own position
Nah. Its clear where you are on this
Can you make a channel in this group 18+?
The gay dude in the group post a link with the F*gg*t slur in the title in response to your own position on that group and you remove the link. Can't get more clear.
that will fix evertything
I'll bring it up with Faith.
I think you might be missing the point. What do you expect to accomplish? Neither side gains anything by trying to assert that the extremist fringe parts of the opposition is worse than their own extremist fringe groups. The larger discussion should be that we should try to rise above the extremism.
https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/793564109286277160
It has nothing to do with the 18+
Glad to know you can read my mind.
scroll back up and look at all the cursing that went on
I appreciate the compliment.
I think its just a bit of miscommunication
you are selecting removing responses to YOUR own position
I am aware, but it's something I have to do in this case, otherwise I'd do what I did last time and censor it in a way that allows people to see what was said, but without the full word. This is exactly why I did that, but I can't censor a link, otherwise it makes the link unusable.
Actually, I can do that via a sort of indirect way.
If you use a URL shortener, and then warn people of the language in the article, that'd be fine.
In our defense they should add it to the rules
Probably couldn't allow embeds on it, but you could use it that way as a point.
Ok, we just found a problem and now lets fix it
No need to take it personally
which is why its inappropriate to both engage in the debate and be the mediator with censorship powers. Additionally, not a single time have I seen curse words removed. The 18+ excuse is simply without merit and anyone can scroll through these chats and recognize that much. Bottom line it was harder for your to defend the ProudBoys as your were doing earlier when faced with their own words in quotes and links to their page
I'm not the person that writes the rules, I just enforce them, and Faith/Robert are extremely busy a majority of the time.
@chuchomucho π
@EZZ, you just advanced to level 1!
I agree im not blaming you\
@Watching the Watchers π€ πΊπΈ
THere is a list of rules?