Message from @guac
Discord ID: 795322707553419275
<:Spicy:690282958761885806>
You know, if you're going to make the case that genetics is responsible for bad behavior, you're basically making the case for misandry as well. Having a Y chromosome instead of another X chromosome tends to affects one's genetic makeup more than skin color. And men tend to be a lot more violent than women.
Its not about arresting all black people but keep them out of your society as good a s possible
yes, this is true
Let them have sub saharan africa or some enclaves in the west
and this also makes a case for why women do not belong in work-related environments
thats why men should be in charge
<:rightchad:717301658983465021>
@Kandarihu sex and race are two different metrics.
Besides. We can pick which to keep and which to not.
my wife will always be in charge of housework
What do you tell a woman with two black eyes?
Nothing. You already told her twice.
@guac So it's okay to discriminate against one but not the other? Why? Because you're part of one but not the other?
what?
Yes.
what does this even mean lol
discrimination is good
hierarchy is great
how is it discriminatory to separate men and women into separate roles
My people come first.
Always.
you are not merely discriminating one gender
men and women are very different and have the unique special natural god given abilities...
you are separating both into sex roles
love hierarchy
hate equality
this
the LORD has sanctioned that men and women have an essence of their own which are not to be confused
much like the spiritual essence of marriage which is a property between a man and a woman
It's not neccesary for blacks to live among whites.
It's neccesary for white men to live among white women. (Especially with blacks around.)
"discriminating" <:pepoeyeroll:707721739655970878>
Yeah. My point was only about that anti-black racism on the idea that they cannot be trusted to be non-violent is dwarfed by men also being more genetically predisposed to violence means that the entire metric justifies discrimination against men in the same way that these people want to discriminate against black people.
No it doesn't, because one is neccesary and the other is foreign.
Yes, I do believe in clear gender roles, and I don't want to get in the way of that. I didn't mean it to be about that.
and my point is that your entire argument hinges on the entire metric being described as "discrimination against men" or "discrimination against blacks" whereas it is merely a difference in social roles being applied to men, or to africans, dependent on sex or on race
Men are neccesary.
Blacks are foreign, dangerous and unnecessary.