Message from @nord

Discord ID: 542858787409625100


2019-02-07 00:02:49 UTC  

Nick Fuentes had a good bit regarding this the other day, @Undercover Academic - IL.

2019-02-07 00:02:54 UTC  

They might even tear it down

2019-02-07 00:02:59 UTC  

“We will grow old in this fight.”

2019-02-07 00:03:01 UTC  

just vote for Tulsi Gabbard lmao

2019-02-07 00:03:21 UTC  

^

2019-02-07 00:03:24 UTC  

literally this

2019-02-07 00:03:38 UTC  

BUILD WALL DEPORT THEM ALL > Oh We'll take care of DACA > 25 BILLION FOR A WALL >5 BILLION FOR A WALL > 5 BILLION FOR STEEL SLATS > 5 BILLION FOR A FENCE > 5 BILLION FOR A FENCE THAT COVERS "KEY" AREAS

2019-02-07 00:03:40 UTC  

what a joke

2019-02-07 00:03:42 UTC  

I'll stand by what I said I never implies Trump was going to build a moat of fire next week, but what would be the difference if he railed on immigration for half an hour than did nothing as well?

2019-02-07 00:04:05 UTC  

No amount of lip service will suffice at this point, sure.

2019-02-07 00:04:13 UTC  

If nothing else it keeps the issue in the public’s kind, I guess. @nord

2019-02-07 00:04:18 UTC  

I’m not voting GOP

2019-02-07 00:04:25 UTC  

And imo no one else should either

2019-02-07 00:04:27 UTC  

"Waht do you need 40 dollars for? I can't believe my own son is demanding 10 dollars from me! HELP POLICE THIS MADMAN IS TRYING TO STEAL 100 DOLLARS FROM ME!!"

2019-02-07 00:04:31 UTC  

Depends on who's running.

2019-02-07 00:04:35 UTC  

Until we get candidates running

2019-02-07 00:04:57 UTC  

Trump was our best chance at electoral, democratic changes from the top

2019-02-07 00:05:04 UTC  

In the short term

2019-02-07 00:05:13 UTC  

@Reinhard Wolff I'm super busy with school and preparing for the interview so won't have time to listen to the fireside, but, now that you're in the chat, I have a question. I have a guy asking if he'd lose his federal security clearance if he joined IE.

2019-02-07 00:06:45 UTC  

I just feel personally that people should weigh their options a bit more before abandoning the GOP and going full accelerationist and voting Dem. Obviously the GOP are not our guys but the alternative is only going to increase immigration at an even greater rate.

2019-02-07 00:07:00 UTC  

*my opinion though believe what you like

2019-02-07 00:07:19 UTC  

Tulsi Gabbard isn't full accelerationist, in fact, I'd argue it's not accelerationist at all

2019-02-07 00:07:46 UTC  

how so?

2019-02-07 00:08:17 UTC  

I don't see any chance of her opposing any sort of amnesty legislation that is put through Congress.

2019-02-07 00:08:37 UTC  

If they discovered he was in IE, yes. But if he applies under an alias and minds his opsec, he should be fine. People in IE have gotten clearances many times in the past. @Jacob

2019-02-07 00:09:22 UTC  

I genuinely think her policies might be better. If Trump isn't going to reduce immigration *anyway*, might as well vote for someone who is going to end foreign wars, which is a large root cause of immigration, and reduce support for Israel, which meddles in American politics @nord @Mojave Paisan - NV

2019-02-07 00:09:36 UTC  
2019-02-07 00:09:56 UTC  

That’s a yes? Even if they’re not contracting?

2019-02-07 00:10:03 UTC  

Or stop believing that voting for politicians who are not explicitly ourguys will change anything.

2019-02-07 00:10:31 UTC  

@Jacob Who's to say that she actually will end foreign wars? Trump said nearly the same thing and we've made very little progress in that direction

2019-02-07 00:10:32 UTC  

Trump shifted the overton window though

2019-02-07 00:10:43 UTC  

Trump was as close to us as a mainstream politician can be, and even he isn't getting anything done, either because he's incapable or unwilling.

2019-02-07 00:10:55 UTC  

I think unwilling

2019-02-07 00:11:03 UTC  

We should support people who indirectly normalize our views

2019-02-07 00:11:33 UTC  

@Mojave Paisan - NV I mean she actually had the balls to go and meet with Assad

2019-02-07 00:12:00 UTC  

I think Trump indirectly normalized our views more in 2016 than now. If we can have another 2016 for some candidate, for the sake of the 2016, then sure, I'll vote for whomever you want. But I don't believe there's going to be a magic candidate to fix anything.

2019-02-07 00:12:49 UTC  

The reality is I don't think tulsi will even get the nomination so maybe this is a pointless line of discussion. And indeed maybe the usefulness of trump is over after a term but I doubt anyone will successfully primary him.

2019-02-07 00:13:19 UTC  

Howard Schultz run is also an interesting dynamic to consider.

2019-02-07 00:13:20 UTC  

In other words, having another year that was empowering for our ideas the way 2016 was would be good, and if it takes another political campaign for us to rally around to make that happen, then so be it. But in that situation, the politics is the means to the end, with the end being the empowerment and boosting our morale and influence. I don't forsee any election solving our problems.

2019-02-07 00:13:48 UTC  

Unless, again, it's someone explicitly aligned with us.

2019-02-07 00:14:00 UTC  

That's the only way I'll get excited about a political candidate again.