Message from @Mereck
Discord ID: 582937027054665768
Just try to play any random *current year* AAA on high/very high settings on a laptop
It's probably gonna cost you a kidney or two
but why current AAA titles instead of normie games like minecraft,LoL,Rimworld(not that normie game), factorio, whatever
While at the same time you could be buying a desktop AND a laptop with decent remote control capabilities
AAA games are shit though
Speaking of the gaymen... how do you figure the built-in graphics on the new Ryzen CPUs will perform?
Because it's gonna be the "worst" on your performance hit
Sure, if you want to play "only" rimworld, suit yourself
NES games on a gba sp is better
But someone who games regularly will generally not play one single game
And even only those you mentionned
I got a 2* ryzen laptop. Its good
So either you're gonna have to have the power to run 'everything'
Or you're gonna restrict yourself to a selection of older/less demanding games
I saw some video where a fecker was playing GTA5 on some onboard graphics. Shit wasn't great looking, but seemed entirely playable.
Some fucko wizardry to be sure.
or just drop the quality down to sane levels
current AAA games look nice even on medium settings
Medium, yeah, low/very low, nah
some do in low but yeah in low-very low mark it starts to become up to devs if they wanted to see effort for those
You can drop like 600 and be perfectly fine
1050/ti is good enough, vidya is a meme tho
Intel
Even on desktop 1050 is very barely appropriate for 'serious' gaming
Jajajaja
Pro gamer larpers are prime market
Yeah and?
?
What I'm trying to point out is that the kind of performance you get for those mid/high end laptop could be achieved for a way cheaper pricemark on desktop
!
+ upgradeability
Wow
can someone write this down? that's some incredible findings
Youre a genius mate
ikr
Im still playing the normie popular games fine on a 5 year old i3 and a 750ti
Lowest settings on an older CPU.