You should be able to take a 🤢 to ur <:really:453005408064241674>

Well nobody here is suggesting we get rid of the 🤢 react

I didn’t here greychak suggest the removal of an emoji lmao I think he can handle them

I asked if it helps us

Why is this even a conversation? Who’s feelings got hurt? Serious question. Bullying *is* against IE policy.

I don't think anyone is hurt.

Yeah bullying is definitely against IE policy

Sorry if I hurt anyone.

I don't think anybody is hurt by it, it's just overused too much in arguments to the point where it comes off as disrespectful and not constructive.

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN sounds like a good suggestion

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/resolution-not-conflict/201303/how-contempt-destroys-relationships

Well I am not in no fun gang. I am pro bantz

<:really:453005408064241674> is biological hardcoded contmpt

:really: is biological hardcoded contmpt

I understand you're trying to come from a good place, but I think you're taking a emoji far too seriously, in the same way that the OK one was memed into driving leftists crazy.

Man is anyone else here just dying watching the fallout over Ilhan Omar's tweets? RW Twitter has had me laughing all morning. I

Just the facts

In most contexts I definitely read <:really:453005408064241674> as passive-aggressive attempt

@ThisIsChris Agreed

It’s good for hittin a dude who’s making an incredibly bad take

Is this really who we are now, calling an emoji biological hard coded contempt with a straight face. Are we going to ask if our emojis are not inclusive enough next. Does the snowflake emoji offend those that live in warmer states. This is the kind of thing that reminds me of college age leftists rather than IE.

SOMEONE JUST USED THE REALLY EMOJI ON ME

MODS

@Kingfish truth is a straight-faced literal response will be appreciated more by the dude you're talking to and the others reading

MODS

Get rektd @ThisIsChris

@Kingfish Ideally yes but it isn't though, it's used to dismiss decent arguments, from people who more often than not, have bad arguments

@Kingfish I did check to see who did it, it was @MrDefault so I know it was not serious

Mr default is bullying me

@MrDefault <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674>

Lol

@DixieBoy76 - KY I have mixed feelings about that image

@ThisIsChris sometimes people will strongly go against IE’s core ideology and start spouting some egregious opinions about things and debating them only makes them more justified so you can just hit em with a good ole really

As Dugin once wrote, emojis have the ability to alter ones perception of their own being in a very Hegelian sense.

<:really:453005408064241674>

@Kingfish I prefer to debate but yeah depending on context that's a fine response

Long story short, it’s a little image of a cartoon face

I think to have a huge policy debate on its usage is ridiculous

Well I think everybody has made their opinions known, time to move on

@Kingfish you can use it well but it can also be used poorly. the debate serves to work out some general rules or principles to go by so everyone is on the same page.