Message from @BurritoPlanet

Discord ID: 578215580423684116


2019-05-15 13:32:02 UTC  

You could try repeating it

2019-05-15 13:32:31 UTC  

Or you could look and see if there are anomalies in the results

2019-05-15 13:32:31 UTC  

is their any real science ones in a lab the one u gave me the guys got a 2x4 duct taped with bowling balls ?

2019-05-15 13:33:30 UTC  

afaik properly done lab experiments generally aren't presented on youtube

2019-05-15 13:34:31 UTC  

idk i feel like gravity is so important and their is like a couple videos maybe proving it maybe not

2019-05-15 13:34:50 UTC  

So the logical thing would be to repeat the experiment yourself and see what result you get right?

2019-05-15 13:35:07 UTC  

i dont have room for tha tin my house

2019-05-15 13:35:38 UTC  

Then I guess all you can do is look at other people's results

2019-05-15 13:37:11 UTC  

so ur convinced mass attracts mass due to mass?

2019-05-15 13:37:32 UTC  

@jeremy What's mass?

2019-05-15 13:37:33 UTC  

I'm just presenting some evidence that i've seen

2019-05-15 13:37:56 UTC  

It appears that when you do a test with sufficient precision, they do attract each other

2019-05-15 13:38:42 UTC  

HAMSTER WHEEL ZOMBIES: https://imgur.com/367s449
INSECTS WALKING IN CIRCLES: https://imgur.com/RrRVIgI

2019-05-15 13:39:16 UTC  

idk sheeple

2019-05-15 13:39:38 UTC  

all that math is too crazy for me

2019-05-15 13:39:45 UTC  

@jeremy Great so stop using it, it's there to try to say weight isn't weight because of murr glappity

2019-05-15 13:39:53 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/578214979493298188/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190315045859.png

2019-05-15 13:40:22 UTC  

There are plenty of people who are willing to explain it to you

2019-05-15 13:40:29 UTC  

It does make sense if you listen

2019-05-15 13:41:50 UTC  

i just think their is a lot of stuff that determines what something weighs and i dont see how their could be a set formula for it

2019-05-15 13:42:17 UTC  

If you knew about the things that determine weight, couldn't you account for them?

2019-05-15 13:42:43 UTC  

maybe

2019-05-15 13:43:16 UTC  

science cant solve a 3 body problem and this weight thing sounds way more complicated

2019-05-15 13:43:36 UTC  

The 3 body problem is very maths-heavy

2019-05-15 13:43:37 UTC  

but idk

2019-05-15 13:43:59 UTC  

3 body problem is impossible

2019-05-15 13:44:01 UTC  

It's about what a system of 3 orbiting bodies will look like at any point in the future, based on their starting position

2019-05-15 13:44:10 UTC  

There's no analytical solution for it right now

2019-05-15 13:44:18 UTC  

Weight is just the force things experience towards the ground

2019-05-15 13:44:33 UTC  

yeah but dont we have satellites out there that are being affected by 3 bodies?

2019-05-15 13:44:46 UTC  

they must have solved a 3 body problem to have satellites no ?

2019-05-15 13:44:50 UTC  

Yes, the trick is to make some assumptions that simplify it

2019-05-15 13:44:58 UTC  

i know how they do with assumptions

2019-05-15 13:45:25 UTC  

It turns out that if one of the bodies is really small, like a satellite compared to a moon, you can consider the gravity of the satellite to be zero

2019-05-15 13:45:39 UTC  

And it becomes practically identical to a 2-body problem

2019-05-15 13:45:43 UTC  

ok what about the sun moon and earth how do u fit a satellite into those 3 bodies

2019-05-15 13:45:59 UTC  

remember the sun and moon are moving trillions of gallons of ocean water around earth right

2019-05-15 13:46:06 UTC  

but not the satellite

2019-05-15 13:46:17 UTC  

suspicious to say the least

2019-05-15 13:46:30 UTC  

Remember that the oceans have much bigger masses than satellites, so they experience a much bigger force

2019-05-15 13:46:48 UTC  

For all i know the sun and moon do distort the orbit by a few meters, I don't know