Not anymore

It is easily debunked because it would reach lightspeed pretty quickly

Also they probably say buoyant force because thats the only other force that would make sense. Everything else would just not work for various reasons. Except bouyant force has massive problems too especially when we get into drag forces so 🤷

It could be spinning and held. Like a ball on a string. With proper speed it would produce gravity at 1 G.

Science has spoken of making satellites that did that.

The Bible basically says that the earth is inside a ball. Flat but like inside a snowball. Also under the great deep so like inside a huge ocean. I suppose it could spin and produce gravity.

if god made pp that mean he gay

Perhaps people are what they are when first created. Over time God helps them be better. Personally I believe when we die we sleep till reborn. Each life we learn how to be better. Reincarnation but we will always be born a human.

Most people I have known do try to get better as they live. Many are much better at older ages. Some do go the other direction.

Thats true for the first one I suppose. Thats a new one that actually makes sense. I keep trying to think but what about this but then i remember tensions from the sphere we would be contained in on the other stuff would make it not matter. So I guess we could be attached to a really big string and spinning. Also that would mean most celestial evidence could be useless

So where wouls ou say the center (of the surface) of the earth is

Evolution

Is the answer

I actually found a way to disprove that claim pf basicly being attached to a string

Gravity or acceleration due to force downward. Whatever you want to call it id usually considered constant in Earth for all normal purposes. But in reality as you go higher the acceleration gets less. Not much but enough to stop this claim.

On top of mt everest the acceleration is -9.77 m/s^2 instead of 9.81 at about sea level.

Going through some variables first

Never mind. I guess as radius decreases acceleration decreases as weird as it seems, so it makes sense

I got nothing. I cant really disprove this arguement without plane times and a map and even then its like ok the center's not there its over here and i cant do anything about that. Im actually changing my role because of this good arguement

I got a huge question about genesis here it is
genesis:1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; "male and female" created he them.
1:28 And God blessed "them", and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
-on the chapter 1 of the genesis god created man and woman and there is "them"
then when chapter comes-
Genesis chapter 2:2-25
it says god rested on 7th day but it says he only created man and later on he created woman
and on the next chapters when cain killed abel it says cain travel to a city
-but god only created adam and eve
where the hell does other people come from
Then I research about this and a woman named lilith came out
"SEARCH LILITH OF GENESIS,ADAM"S FIRST WIFE"

bruh

you know people can reproduce by themselves

but the bible said only adam and eve then where the hell that city came from and people was in there
the bible only created adam and eve in that era
and their son cain and abel was the only people in that period

Anybody find it suspicious that people claim that eyes were first evolved from light sensing and shadowing sensing bacteria and next to fish yet when you look up diagram of eye cell there is literally no connection. Horizontal gene transfer is impossible in this case because the bacteria didnt become plastids. Anyone want to try and explain this. Im guessing noone will be able too correctly but I suppose i will let people try if they want

And who are you?

You studied gene science?

<a:popcorn:507983990385541140>

a student

“Scientism” wins because genesis is meaningless when the Bible is void of truth in almost every instance

Scientism isn't even science, it gives fast records of things that never happened, there was no evolution soup

There was but atleast not the amount paleontologists claim. Or atleast like 25% is just specalutive

Look

Why are you so strictly against evoluting?

Like, even theologists acknowledge it

Im against alot the specifics of evolution because its so speculative without much evidence to support it. Paleontologists will be like "i found a new genus of dinosaurs everyone" then like a year/2 years later they'll realize "sorry we were wrong. Its this other genus of dinosaurs." Literally paleontologist are just trying to get more fossils to get new dinosaurs. Not to try to find out what the fossil really is

It changes because new fossils are found that lead to a change of perspective on that fossil.

But genetic analysis are pretty correct

But exactly. There not making claims on enough data

@Derek Nelson here.

@Uncle Kidney Loves Booty okay.

Okay, so, if you would listen for a few seconds, I will explain my take on religion in general.