Message from @Hirohito's chins
Discord ID: 587704127233064960
Demonozing co2 is the dumbest position anyone could ever take.
Unless you want to kill everything
@Citizen Z would that not be harmful to humans in anyway?
Co2 is good and im sticking to my story
Life has also thrived at the bottom of the ocean and in Antarctica
Just because it’s habitable for them
Doesn’t mean it’s habitable for us
single cell organisms are much more survivable than humans
for sure
Life on the suface of the earth thrived with co2 levels many times higher
Interesting point Citizen
Again, life also thrived in the marianas trench.
doesn’t mean humans can live down there
Yes exactly
Life thrives because of co2
I agree with you @Citizen Z
As global warming is not what it seems
Co2 said
Hoes mad
My mom told me that co2 hoes mad
The earth is flat.
Agent Smith is gay
Morpheus is gay
v
We are only at .04%
50% increase would be .06%
Well within human limitations
Not even .1
We can handle 1.0%
The "survey" was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom [only] 3,146 responded. Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them "experts."
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with "the consensus". That's where the 97 per cent comes from.
shows you how they manipulate the numbers to push a agenda
So this is a very Michael Mann "reconstruction": just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.