Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?
Yep. Out of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to "count" for the climate change survey that every mainstream media news organization quotes as FACT.

Not quite the "settled science" you've been told, is it? In fact, it all looks rather shoddy.
By contrast, over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative.

http://humansarefree.com/2016/09/over-30000-scientists-declare-climate.html

so more scientist claim it is a HOAX than says it is real hahahaha

A staggering 30,000+ scientists have come forward confirming that man-made climate change is a hoax perpetuated by the elite in order to make money.

The science is clearly not settled, and banning people from talking about it, based on evidence, is not only unethical, but... unscientific.

And, of course, there are the more than 31,487 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields.

that is way more than 75 scientist they used for the study hahahaha

Okay

So

I see

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2009EO030002

https://youtu.be/SKTEIDH_qfU

https://youtu.be/G7__IoUiq2c

All those plants and trees that require evil co2 need to go

Do you spend all day trying to get banned?

This never made any sense to me. We breathe out CO2 in O2. Plants love CO2. They thrive as it goes up. I have seen more and more plant life. Crops will grow faster with it. I simply can not see the damage more of it would do. A bit warmer would be wonderful for most of us. We could live further north.

hey @Citizen Z

Yes? @Hirohito's chins

how come i still cant speak in some of he channels

@Citizen Z

@Hirohito's chins you have to have new member role removed.

how do i got about doing that

How do you folks resolve the fact that major oil companies found proof of human-emission caused climate change and then deliberately spread misinformation to make people believe it was a hoax

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/sep/19/shell-and-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings

Doesn’t it make much more sense that climate Change is real and that the denial of it is the conspiracy?

What would be the motive for scientists claiming climate change is real?

Do you think it compares at all to the clear and obvious profit motive that coal and oil companies have in hiding climate change?

I simply cannot understand how someone who claims to be a seeker of truth can be fooled by these corporations and their lies

http://www.climatefiles.com/exxonmobil/1982-memo-to-exxon-management-about-co2-greenhouse-effect/

http://www.climatefiles.com/shell/1988-shell-report-greenhouse/

“Shell’s assessment foresaw a one-meter sea-level rise, and noted that warming could also fuel disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, resulting in a worldwide rise in sea level of “five to six meters.” That would be enough to inundate entire low-lying countries.
Shell’s analysts also warned of the “disappearance of specific ecosystems or habitat destruction,” predicted an increase in “runoff, destructive floods, and inundation of low-lying farmland,” and said that “new sources of freshwater would be required” to compensate for changes in precipitation. Global changes in air temperature would also “drastically change the way people live and work.” All told, Shell concluded, “the changes may be the greatest in recorded history.”
For its part, Exxon warned of “potentially catastrophic events that must be considered.” Like Shell’s experts, Exxon’s scientists predicted devastating sea-level rise, and warned that the American Midwest and other parts of the world could become desert-like”

“Despite scientific uncertainties, the bottom line was this: oil firms recognized that their products added CO2 to the atmosphere, understood that this would lead to warming, and calculated the likely consequences. And then they chose to accept those risks on our behalf, at our expense, and without our knowledge.”

Good sci fi story

Complete garbage tho

I could explain why it's garbage. Problem is i dont care if ppl want to believe a bunch of bs like that.

So oh well. The liberals will self destruct from lies.

If you tell one lie, you have to tell 100 more.

The truth is easy

Build yourself around truth and your life will be easier

the truth is easy when it's "oh yeah? well, it's simply not happening" lol