Message from @RogueReflector

Discord ID: 633498111548981278


2019-10-15 02:52:08 UTC  

The red shift thing?

2019-10-15 02:52:14 UTC  

yep

2019-10-15 02:52:23 UTC  

Ya I gotta read about that

2019-10-15 02:52:34 UTC  

I think it's corraborated in another way

2019-10-15 02:52:47 UTC  

Like the size of the objects has certain things going on

2019-10-15 02:52:52 UTC  

If I cut a circle out of cardboard go@in a field and u don’t know how far away I am I can tell the size of the circle ?

2019-10-15 02:53:02 UTC  

Yes,

2019-10-15 02:53:07 UTC  

U can tell ?

2019-10-15 02:53:14 UTC  

Wanna know how?

2019-10-15 02:53:25 UTC  

I doubt u could

2019-10-15 02:53:29 UTC  

But go ahead

2019-10-15 02:53:32 UTC  

I can tell you

2019-10-15 02:53:39 UTC  

Go tell me

2019-10-15 02:53:42 UTC  

Please

2019-10-15 02:54:04 UTC  

I can stand in one spot and zero out my pointer , targeting the object

2019-10-15 02:54:12 UTC  

Ok

2019-10-15 02:54:25 UTC  

Then walk 45 ft to the right, and read my pointers new angle

2019-10-15 02:54:25 UTC  

Ur pointer ?

2019-10-15 02:54:38 UTC  

Yes a device that tells me the angle I'm pointing

2019-10-15 02:54:55 UTC  

I have a right triangle then

2019-10-15 02:55:19 UTC  

And angle and a side of the triangle, boom I can calc the distance

2019-10-15 02:55:30 UTC  

Then I can measure the angular size of the object

2019-10-15 02:55:38 UTC  

Then calc its actual size

2019-10-15 02:55:49 UTC  

This device

2019-10-15 02:55:50 UTC  

@RogueReflector as I mentioned before, there are two sources of redshift: The most obvious source of redshift is doppler (including time dilation due to special relativity); the less obvious source of redshift is gravitational, which depends on gravitational potential (confirmed through the Harvard Tower Experiment, and similarly repeated experiments).

2019-10-15 02:55:54 UTC  

Is a sextant ?

2019-10-15 02:56:03 UTC  

@jeremy nah a theodolite is better

2019-10-15 02:56:47 UTC  

Hmmm

2019-10-15 02:57:00 UTC  

For the Hubble Law (and the hubble constant) to be valid, gravitational redshift needs to be decoupled from doppler (redshift due to motion)

2019-10-15 02:57:46 UTC  

@SunRazor I see. I don't knowuch about that

2019-10-15 02:58:22 UTC  

Ok

2019-10-15 02:58:43 UTC  

So u got ur sextant or theodolite u do this with the moon and the sun

2019-10-15 02:58:46 UTC  

@jeremy simple geometry

2019-10-15 02:59:21 UTC  

U come up with some valid numbers ?

2019-10-15 02:59:28 UTC  

@jeremy for the sun it doesn't work bc the angles change is too small

2019-10-15 02:59:43 UTC  

If you could quantify how much of the redshift is due to motion (expansion of the universe) and how much redshift is due to a difference in gravitational potential, on one end of a spectrum the galaxies far away could be still and just at a lower gravitational potential than we are today, and on the other end the galaxies are at equal gravitational potential as we are today and are moving away from us. The hubble law assumes that the redshift is due entirely to the doppler effect caused by the expansion of the universe.

2019-10-15 02:59:53 UTC  

For the moon yes it works. We can measure it's parallax from diff places on the earth

2019-10-15 03:00:06 UTC  

Or it could be because we never see the actual sun we see the apparent position of the sun no ?

2019-10-15 03:00:29 UTC  

Dunno what that would do, no matter what we see the apparent position of every object

2019-10-15 03:00:32 UTC  

So ok u got ur pointer u check ur angles to the moon what number u get

2019-10-15 03:00:35 UTC  

That's just a give