@rivenator12113 Again, that makes no sense. Might wanna recheck your math.

so you are saying that nasa is false?

good job one step to being a flat earther

little by little you will see the bull shit they feed us

@anon415454+4646 It is! They know the type and luminosity expected from it though, with that, that can use that as a reference for similar types of stars.

@rivenator12113 NASA has never said Polaris is traveling at the speed of light

"They know the type and luminosity expected from it" how?

@anon415454+4646 They can measure it

yeah but how

@SAM101907 im saying that if it is 323 light-years away according to nasa, then it should be travelling faster than the speed of light to be able to work on a globe earth lol

@anon415454+4646 They can reference it from our own star.

but how

@rivenator12113 That is not correct whatsoever.

thats the main question

im not trying to be anoying but the "how" qustion is really what matters¨

@anon415454+4646 what do you mean how? Like how to they calculate the lumens?

yes

@SAM101907 Alright, can you please tell me how the Polaris stars are able to be located at the same location everyday when they are 323 light-years away and we are revolving aroudn the sun please

how do you know from lumens how far or how big the star is

or what it is made of

lol i think he quit

just ask any globe earthers this question: how the Polaris stars are able to be located at the same location everyday when they are 323 light-years away and we are revolving around the sun

polaris was the key for me

but the long exposure pictures of polaris doesnt serve well for

flat earth claim

the stars are revolving in a circle around the polaris

for me it was the nasa footage glitches and the ropes, warner von braun firmament quote on his death, polaris and how nasa said they cant even go back to the moon

@anon415454+4646 You can use a spectrograph to determine the elements in the star. The light waves reflected back with give you its composition (this has been tested on earth already). As for luminosity, if we know the distance to the sun, and we know it’s luminosity, than we can look at another similar star and calculate distance by the rate the decrease in brightness or what not.

that doesnt make sense unless you are directly under the polaris

also the accidental moon data which was lost

@rivenator12113 You just said it’s 323 lightyears away. A massive object that far and bright won’t appear to move much.

@SAM101907 Nice, you see how NASA bull shits us? I quoted it from NASA, you see how it doesn't make sense?

There are two possibilities, 1 that we are living on a flat earth and the polaris stars is revolving above earth or 2 that the polaris stars are going faster than the speed of light. Which one is it?

@rivenator12113 It makes plenty of sense. And no, that does not mean Polaris is traveling at the speed of light.

@SAM101907 but how do you know that the object you are looking at isnt ten times bigger but ten times further?

or maybe the distance is the same but the star is smaller but brighter

how do you decide that

@SAM101907 Please explain how the Polaris stars that are 323 lightyears away are showing up at the same location every day? That wouldn't make any sense on a globe earth, please take a minute and imagine it in your head.

@anon415454+4646 they measure the light waves coming from it. The more redshifted it is, the further away it is.

@rivenator12113 I honestly don’t see the issue. It’s 323 light years away and relatively stationary, why does it need to be going faster?

how do you know that the star doesnt just emit red light?