Message from @rivenator12113
Discord ID: 605767659472027660
We shouldn't be able to see it at the same location every day if it is relatively stationery and if it's 323 light years away
thats a circle thinking
@anon415454+4646 Spectrograph
@SAM101907 bro please, have you went to college? you should be able to make 3 premises and a conclusion, but your argument will still be invalid
ignore the first part, very rude of me
@rivenator12113 Picture this. If you were swinging next to a boat, and it moved ten feet in front of you left to right, it’s quite noticeable. Now have that same boat about 4 miles away and move the same distance, it will be hardly noticeable.
Swimming*
so many comments on this channel, cant find my previous message T_T
323 light years would be relatively way more than 4 miles away lol
@SAM101907 Please write your premies and your conclusion, I will show you where it is invalid.
Now if you swing ten feet to the right, the boat will still appear in the same location, because it’s so far. Ten feet compared to four miles is nothing. As is the diameter of earths orbit compared to 323 light years.
Swim*
Again, false comparison the distance away would be considerable further from the boat
Exactly!
See, then it shouldn't be 323 light years away
It would be unsound
According to Nasa
Why? It makes perfect sense. We hardly see any movement from it because of its incomprehensible distance.
If it
is very further away from the boat, wouldn't it need to be moving at an insane speed for us to notice it?
I don't know why I'm still typing lol. This argument of yours is unsound if you choose to side with NASA
Why would it need to be moving at insane speed?
If it is 323 light years away, we wouldn't be able to see it at the same location every day. Because it would have to catch up to us every day when we revolve around the sun if you believe in the heliocentric model
Now if the earth was stationery and the distance was truly that far away, then we would see it in the same spot every day.
@SAM101907 but with spectograph you can only measure the light that already traveled here
it is impossible to measure the star itself since it trillions of kms away
is this real
@SAM101907 Check out eddie bravo flat earth podcast, he has some good arguments and some bad ones. Don't take everything for facts, imagine the premises and if they make sense. I really like the polaris one because you can't disprove it without believing in a geocentric model or if you don't believe in NASA
This should explain it
@hehexd the "earth" on your gif doesnt have antarctica nor arctica
@anon415454+4646 You are correct, it would be at a different location. The light that hits us is from a younger star. That only means we are looking at its past motion and composition.
@SAM101907 i have to give it to you that those perfect circles doesnt make sense on flat earth
from the picture of the article you posted
They wouldn’t, neither would the ones on the South Pole either.
i dont believe there is a revolving point on so called south pole but i may be wrong
if the firmament claim was to be true the long exposure photos of polaris stars revolvment should be elipsoid
not perfect circle