R.I.P

aliminum has a lower melting point than the structural steel of the building

which building

I think thats supose to be from world trade center

no i think those images were examples of stuff burning

even then, the steel from wtc didn't need to melt

it just needed to get hot to lose structural integrity

Yes

@Wesker @Hickory @entropic @Bear Hands @PopReference @VidGam Nut

Welcome to the Ice Wall 😁

I heard it was hot enugh to weaken it by half

hi welcome

Thanks

@The Gwench thanks niggy

Lower levels where already under stress from the weight
Something crashing down at the top woild cause the entire building to collapse

@The Gwench whats this server about in general

is it antarctica stuff

Flat earth?

I guess?

also the reflection of the downward wave means the impact is 2x at the bottom floor

We are a conspiracy server focused mainly on flat earth

https://jacobitemag.com/2019/07/15/disintegration/

i dont beleive in flat earth but im into antarctica conspiracies

i think a plane was more than enough to bring down wtc

🇧

That’s fine

also have you read the nist report on wtc7

literally goes into the specifics of everything

it's crazy

look up the comvustion temperature of kerosene

Bush was reading a book upside down

And the strength at temperature graph of the steel of the building

"The flash point of kerosene is between 37 and 65 °C (100 and 150 °F), and its autoignition temperature is 220 °C (428 °F)."

i mean the burn temperature not the flash point

428 f

🤔

not sure

but i'd say the amount in a plane can easily reach a combined 1000 c

The autoignition point would be burn point

Thats not the burn temperature

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel

https://youtu.be/UpSkBk5AqtY