state by definition limits liberty

if you want a govt you are anti liberty

im anti anarchy

it's not a bad thing per se, depends on what "liberty" you limit

i want minimal government

no, minimal govt will just lead to the same shit as before

that's what the founders created

I want a govt with a huge dick

and look at it now

i support government for legitimate purposes, like protecting borders and killing leftists

@ChillS ok i'll run for pres then

>demons don't exi-

minimal government but with rules put in place in the constitution to preserve the white majority

that's the result of your minarchist freeedumb memes

axiomatically minarchism leads to monopolistic control of banking

Minimal government but actually it's a fascist dictatorship under me <:smug:402400327313391616>

>pretending that shit wasn't literally illegal

i want a government that upholds our culture and makes it illegal to be a faggot and/or race mixing communist

it was

but the point is, firms will gain great power through competition and game theory playing out

it was illegal to fuck other men in most states fam

which means maybe 10-100 winners

and those winners will then buy govt

I want a government that gives me free pussy

Imagine thinking 20th century ideology is traditionalist lmao

<:GWcorbinHolyFuck:384871347756728321>

and because democracy is a weak system, corruption is easier

since power is less concentrated

and tracking corruption is more difficult

democracy is a bad meme ill give ya that

democratic republic is bad

Americanism sorry to say is bad

I know the founders didn't intend this

gonna post physique

idk

ah yes fascism is so strong that's why all these fascist countries are around like-
*shuffles paper*
uhh
UMMM

should I?

@Jbruh go ahead g

democracy is gay tbh

^

paost fuhzeek