Excuse me, what do you call a dictionary on drugs?

@Rez at Dorsia a mistake?

@RabbiLeo would you rather I pretend to know what I'm talking about?

High-Definition

Kek

It's best to learn, and keep on learning.

@Verm this^

@Verm If health insurance is govt required, then cigarettes should be illegal. I don't want to put into a community fund which will be drained by degenerates.

Remind yourself that the existance of government health insurance gives power to the state. There's no reason they'd want to get rid of tobacco or other harmful substances, since that'd destroy the projected need for said healthcare.

The population must be kept tame and willing. Indoctrination is king, and the progressives know it all too well.

preach

If a state had eugenics as a core principle, then your statement would be wrong.

^

no state should have eugenics

WTF?

what?

am I wrong for not wanting the government to sterilize me?

Depends. If the state decides upon whom the eugenics are performed on, you'd be correct. - If it's by the population, and in limited measure in worst-case scenarios like most of europe currently, you'd be wrong.

The former however, is currently only applied by third world shitholes though.

Eugenics is the betterment of genes. I dont what the opposite term would be?

Huh.

I have no idea either.

look i'm willing to allow a sub-par gene pool if the alternative is letting the government sterilize people

keep the government away from my nuts

Start by improving the genepool then and sterilize yourself with a coat hanger and a waffle iron @RAF

@RabbiLeo How does that work?

Instead of performing eugenics, let the choice be on the people's part and promote pairings of high-intellect individuals. Do this for long enough and the gene pool, while not in utmost efficiency, will improve.

@Manimalia as gruesomely as you can imagine

i agree with redguard here]

@Verm Natural mating practices can be a factor in eugenics.

i want a good genepool but i would rather it be voluntary

It's certainly more humane than forced sterilization.

Or genetic culling.

Sterilization is only one part of eugenics.

Voluntary sterilization would be a respectable act.

If you think your lineage is not worthy, a self-less act of a vasectomy would be viewed heroically.

Implying anyone would actually see you as a hero for getting your fallopian tubes/vas deferens tied or burned shut.

These kind of things are generally kept private.

It's natural to feel shame for such.

Other aspects of eugenics would be polygamous marriages consisting of one strong male with multiple females, in a non-homosexual way.

Do you recall the "Lebensbourn" concept? Not sure of spelling.