Let me get you the link

hold up

Where the link be?

@Da_Fish

hold up

Neo liberalism

Decentralized Syndicalism with an Agrarian focus, and a distinguishing between private property (property used to make profit, which can still exist but functions differently) and property owned by a family (homesteads, farms, ranches, etc)

Also decentralized to the point where you can build a house, start a business, etc. without getting the government's permission, but it will be disintegrated if you don't make any efforts to incorporate said industry's respective syndicate, violate laws, cause unrest or harm to the community and workers, etc

Think american libertarians but economically left

ayyyy, fellow dist/syndi @V-NAF_Aardist

whats up

@Alexander Ramsey Not a ton. Plotting my NatSyn revolt like usual

Yknow, "Long Live Rivera" and what not

Nice

capitalism with lots of regulations but no unnecessary state owned businesses

I don't like the idea of absolute free markets

I think that leads to mindless consumerism, and I think the average person is too stupid to look out for companies with bad intentions

^

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Is non-defensive military action/intervention ever justified? If so, under what circumstances?

No

Yes, anytime the USA sees it as fit.

Never

Possibly when genocide is taking place

INDIVIDUAL

Debatable at that case

@Froce is that all you say?

Uh

Yes, whenever the nation's interests are threatened

No no no

Absolutely. Human history is determined by the most powerful overcoming their weaker adversaries, and the fact that modern civilization does not do this is simply a temporary phenomenon. War is inevitable, as it is impossible not to threaten a nation's values at all indefinitely. This, and economic or political aggression by another country, when taken to the extreme, is potential for a retaliation

Offensive war can not be justified unless your allies are being assaulted unjustly

yes, it can

it can

lets say that a region occupied by one nation contains over 90% of your nation's citizens by nationality, and they are potentially being mistreated because of it

the nation becomes hostile when asked to remedy the situation

therefore a justification to claim that region by whatever means is justified

That just makes you a psychopath

you see, it is quite easy to tell when your neighbors, or anyone, is acting aggressive, whther it is to scare you or to literally invade you, armed conflict immidealty becomes an option. For example when Arab arms mobilized on Israel's borders in 1967 the Israeli's decided to make the first strike and bomb Egypts airforce bases to demobilize its airforce and get immideate air superiority, was it a dick move? yes but it kept it alive and that's all that matters.

hopefully my argument makes sense

I reject just war theory, so a nation can engage in military action for any reason under any circumstances