Yeah? It doesnt concern you that a group that represents less than 5% of the population owns 95% of american media?

>sources

Because theyve done such a fine job promoting american ideals and never promoted cultural decay?

I mean pure merit isnt an excuse, some roles some functions must remain only in the hands of those loyal to the nation because those roles shape the very fabric of the nation and its direction

95%? No

controlling these roles grants you controll over a lot. Which is why I am for only native voting rights for example

also, what if this couple of jewish people with money decide to lobby for you to get into wars on the other side of the planet?

(but thats europe a veyr different situation)

what about jewish people who've lived here for centuries and are just as much a part of the country as anyone else

Uplifting titles such as the feminine mystique by betty (((friedan))) promoting social discontent to women in the 1960s and beyond? There is a treasure trove of more examples that i can present that you will make excuses for

Then I’ll stand up against the war and the system, I don’t care how they spend their money

@Jay1532 lay all of the examples you can find on me

you don't care how they spend their money... but you'll go against wars that they lobby for, and the system that enables them to do so... ok

Yes

Free country, they can say and spend how they want, and I can do the same

It’s the system that allows the behavior, people will take advantage no matter what

Fix the system

It’s not the fault of the “Jews”

Griselda the issue is, if athnicity A decides to go to war, you have no choice its called the draft. Fixing the system requires supressing other ethnicities by default or certain ethnicities

what

because say if you say NGO's ar eillegal, hypothetically, it iwll affect say asians dispraportionately

I cant right now, still at a labor day party. Ill do it later though

The American government isn’t an ethnicity

^

this will mean you are supressing asians dispraportionately which is infringement on their group, they will then press back as a group. The american govorment represents interests and interests have groups behind them

you know i've never seen any actual evidence that jews control the media or anything like this

i'd like to see that

What do asian people have to do with any of this

It’s not about ethnicity,

Ethnicity is not people’s politics

Start with zuckerberg of facebook, zucker of cnn, the list goes on (and on)

the list goes on (from two)

Im not claiming asians, im claiming a hypothetical. And yes it is. Ethnicity is your identity, it is a fundumental part of that what makes you. You therefore will eventually under due pressure identify with that group, coincidentally or not, resulting in a specific political outlook. Caused by your group trying to express itself, gain pwoer, or survive

Heres a huffpo article by a jew admitting that jews are extensively involved in media

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/753227

Its a damage control article saying that they dont act in concert or as a conspiracy, but the point remains

lmaooo the article literally says the exact opposite of what you've been saying that they're all working together

My point is that there are a lot of things that make up us, however everything is downstream, or built on the foundations of immutable characteristics which form a primary identity, which then is formed as a social identity in relation and one made form others, you then have tertiary identity so cultural etc. However it is all intimately linked to those immutable characteristics.

If you continue to have your head in the sand, adam, i can only assume you are jewish yourself or a libertarian desperately holding onto the idea that everyone is an individual working for themselves only

but it does say that they have influence in the media...

No, the point you disagree with is that there is extensive jewish ownership of media