No, that's right they ARE bad

What about people who hate their domestic country?

and why?

But they don't have to be deported or murdered

They can stay

Those two things aren't contradictory

Why are they "bad"?

Have we established what my position is first before you argue with the voices in your head?

nice ad-hom

anyhow, answer my question.

I'm waiting.

It's not an ad-hom, because I did not use it in place of an argument

attack on my character, regardless

Yes, but it wasn't an argument

So

Do you intend to answer my question?

Yes

If you intend to state my position so that I don't have to address a strawman again and we getit straightened out now

go ahead

I've been waiting.

I wanted you to state it, but it doesn't look like you're going to

So it's find

*fine

I'll do it myself

Having foreigners be dissidents within your country is not the same as having your own people be dissidents

Both are bad

who pinged me

That's not the question I asked.

Alright, well then I'll answer yours

Why is it bad?

@SilverLining hello

@The Big Oof

What is the QOTD

To put it simply:

It's bad because a fractured nation will not stand, for one.

Since you're pretty materialistic, we can explain it like this:

What if you're a nation like China, and your country splits apart?

You're no longer a superpower, and are far less capable of defending your now broken up country from outside nations that seek to take it by force. @SilverLining

Nations with large regions of people that don't care about the rest of the country tend to have those regions break away

in short

razorlaze, what are you two debating?

it started here @Snakeisninja

this is when I entered

You mean define cosmopolitan?