I think your problem is you have it in your head that we don't believe there are exceptions to the rule

Not really

No one is saying all of them

Or else why whine about the monolith

You're looking at exceptions and casting them as the majority

Unless the criminal rate is above 50%

that's exactly what you're doing

This is false

I said they were more criminal on average

not all of them are criminals

The crime rate is disproportionately high for their population

Not even most of them are criminals, in fact

emyia, at least

Never said that either

said, quote

"a large majority of latino and black minority groups are criminal, lazy, immoral, and anti American"

Well i didn't, and he probably misspoke

I said in my personal experience

I encourage the anti-American bit, to be fair

In ghettos

And only ghettos

Ghettos being economically impoverished regions?

Yes

Okay

Shitty people tend to be more criminal, doesn't mean all or even most shitty people are criminals

And you're saying that, outside of ghettos, minority groups don't exhibit those traits?

Right, emyia?

or

Don't exhibit them to the same degree**

I am not saying that, I am only speaking on my experiences. As for outside of these areas I dont full well know but I do know they have disproportionately high crime rates for being such a small part of the population

In suburban communities, as the one I now live in these traits I have found less common

But I have only lived in three suburban areas

Suburban communities being more economically prosperous

I cant speak for all

Yes

So you're saying that said traits are found commonly within impoverished regions

but not as much in more affluent locations

More or less

While also saying minority groups are often more economically troubled than majority groups

Considering disproportional representation in poorer demographics

Do you believe class could be a factor?