Message from @^^^

Discord ID: 521461876257849374


2018-12-08 23:07:34 UTC  

even in the tech sphere

2018-12-08 23:07:37 UTC  

AI isn't the focus

2018-12-08 23:07:48 UTC  

china can win the AI race but would still be considered technologically behind

2018-12-08 23:08:22 UTC  

in fact to be quite honest, winning the AI race at this point would be counterproductive

2018-12-08 23:08:50 UTC  

what other countries are working on can't just be "copied", but AI theoretically can be copied much more easily

2018-12-08 23:09:53 UTC  

thing is, so many science fiction books and movies have drilled the "this is the future" quota into us, so we as humans can just barely imagine what we could possibly be doing if our minds were more opened and, even with the crappy technology we have (compared to what we *could* be having).

2018-12-08 23:10:37 UTC  

well atm the majority of the western world is focusing on CPS

2018-12-08 23:10:47 UTC  

I can't speak as much for the east

2018-12-08 23:11:16 UTC  

developing CPS requires a lot of manual work that takes years and years to roll out, even if you have a solution you can just copy

2018-12-08 23:11:25 UTC  

so by all means let china develop AI then steal it after

2018-12-09 02:00:23 UTC  

Has anyone noticed that AI has been showing right wing patterns?

2018-12-09 02:01:35 UTC  

Especially when shown for recruitment, Amazon & Facebook for example had to actually remove theirs because it pretty much said that no woman was fit for the higher up positions.

2018-12-09 02:02:20 UTC  

"Why are you booing me I'm right"

2018-12-09 02:02:43 UTC  

But yeah, I think if the right were to Capitalize on AI, there could be some benefits.

2018-12-09 02:03:06 UTC  

It might also change people's general receptions and responses to it.

2018-12-09 02:03:15 UTC  

Might remove the dystopia stigma.

2018-12-09 10:46:54 UTC  

because AI sees only parameters that need to be filled and so it without discrimination eliminates candidates however people have natural predispositions. Sex, age etc. And the algorythm will simply sort these people out. The issue for AI is always distinguishing the best candidate.

It can usually get a general demographic and general group of people that are a good fit. However once that gorup is established it fails to pick the best candidate from that group since the differences are often times even illogical

2018-12-09 10:47:11 UTC  

its basically hard to code into an algorythm these minute differences that make the biggest difference.

2018-12-09 23:02:42 UTC  

Daily Question 🔖

To what extent should the government play in personal life?
<@&479643036951904267>

2018-12-09 23:03:05 UTC  

Zero

2018-12-09 23:03:19 UTC  

Total as long as you are the government

2018-12-09 23:03:32 UTC  

none at all, as long as you aren't attacking others through force or fraud

2018-12-09 23:03:43 UTC  

Prevention of sinful behaviors. That's it

2018-12-09 23:03:51 UTC  

@everyone Daily Question above

2018-12-09 23:03:59 UTC  

having your name lord tachanka is sinful behavior

2018-12-09 23:03:59 UTC  

Local governments should play a lot, mainly to weed out undesirable people who will cripple society with their degeneracy

2018-12-09 23:04:00 UTC  

nothing except for abortion

2018-12-09 23:04:00 UTC  

Stupid Ben

2018-12-09 23:04:17 UTC  

central not much, it's too easily corruptible

2018-12-09 23:04:26 UTC  

prevent murder, rape, and destruction of property

2018-12-09 23:04:35 UTC  

prevent racisum

2018-12-09 23:04:50 UTC  

I disagree

2018-12-09 23:05:03 UTC  

to Erika

2018-12-09 23:05:03 UTC  

Just to prevent the breaking of law and keep everything in order.

2018-12-09 23:05:08 UTC  

Privacy should only be invaded if there’s probable cause of a crime or a threat to national security

2018-12-09 23:05:08 UTC  

Aside from that, nothing.

2018-12-09 23:05:15 UTC  

Forcing people to not be racist is pretty gay

Preventing crimes is the law, preventing racism is removing freedom of speech