use it against civilians

that's a seperate argument

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1519608/Worst-war-crime-committed-by-US-in-Iraq.html

like that, or

do you think that we should get rid our military?

Slash funding severely I say

cut all aid to Israel

keep some troops stationed in Rojava, purely defensively, until local militas are able to take over the situation

then pull out

what was the conclusion of that?

did they conclude that it happened?

Uh

I mean, the corpses kinda speak

no

the court

what did it conclude

IIRC, in this incident, the guy said that "If what he did was a crime, then most soldiers would be prosecuted"
lemme find it

you're also

presuming the court is infallible

it's better to presume you're infallible

and not, y'know, biased in favor of the soldiers with guns fighting for lobbied oil interests

So you're saying that if a nation doesn't recognize its own war crimes

everything is ok?

you should be used at the objective beacon then

I'm telling you that you don't have proof that it happened

and even if it did

it's a rogue action

not one the military ordered

or approved of

iraq was a clusterfuck

"Investigators examining the buildings where the killings took place found there was no evidence of a firefight.

Instead they are understood to have concluded that the killings were "methodical in nature" and occurred as the unit conducted a sweep through a town lasting three to five hours.

Among the dead were five men standing near a taxi at a checkpoint and killings inside at least two homes that included women and children, unnamed officials were quoted as saying."

because entire villages were violent toward the US soldiers

Oh

So shooting unarmed civilians who didn't resist

or put up a fight

is ok

'cuz maybe they didn't like the men with guns

that didn't happen

sweeping through their town

uh

eh, I'll just not waste my time