Message from @warriorman8
Discord ID: 492855521980841984
But why are they treated different, by the law and socially? *(This is to begin a discussion; I’m genuinely interested on other’s outlooks.)*
Treated differently in what aspect
Like how they’re seen by the general public?
Yes, and how their message is contrasted to their beliefs and actions.
For instance, CNN and other legacy media outlets portray ANTIFA as some kind of “good guy” or ignores their presence completely, meanwhile putting all lights on Alt-Right groups when crimes are committed by their members.
They even called the guy who killed that woman at the protest an “alt right Nazi”
I was once a leftist
The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong
Everything else they stood for were despicable lies
I feel like racism and xenophobia are a part of human condition.
"The only thing they were right about was that racism is wrong"
HOLD IT RIGHT THERE
I wouldn't say it's wrong, it's more like a barrier you can overcome for better relations.
Hot take: Racism is natural
That doesn't mean you have to go up in arms about somebody being annoyed that their country is flooded with mongrels, and disgusting, loathesome wretches.
Quick tip: Somalians hate other Somalians because they're nasty, depraved curs.
Dirty, diseased, crime-loving, and lazy
It's not racist to make an obvious observation of behaviour.
I would hate a person based on what he believes and does
The problem is that certain people are more inclined to believe certain things and do certain things @warriorman8
It's not
If I found them generally distasteful, and unseemly as a majority, I would definitely dislike the nationality as a whole.
Like Somalians.
You're also going in it with a different understanding of the topic than I have, that is to say, you're arguing with the assumption I also think race is skin deep.
I do not @warriorman8
I mean you can distrust a person but not punish them over it
Protecting your country isn't punishing anyone
Well, I'm going to distrust them until they become a problem.
It's a country's right
to exclude who it wants
A country need not allow people into it.
Sure, just like I need not save someone who's about to be run over by a train.
You can just enforce law
True.
It's kinda a shitty thing to do,but I don't *need* to do it.
Why would you?
You would be putting yourself at risk for potentially no reward.
If I could easily do it with minimal risk to myself, then because of basic human empathy
Saving someone else is a reward in and of itself.
For example supreme general duterte is under an ongoing war with criminals
Basic human empathy shouldn't need to be explained