that doesn't mean it's a failure

as you look at it now, it's doing well

Allegedly he became somewhat more interventionist after the second recession (which he caused), but I need to read more into such claims

Not sure

when was the date

I don't believe thats a failure

since it takes time and it's shown to be thriving now

and improving

1% lives below the 1.90$ poverty line

10% below 5 dollars a day

that's now

well, an idealogy of pure greed and materialism will lead any nation to ruin

it wasn't doing so good through the majority of his rule

Yeah it takes time some time

for the free market to work

since it's working now

and has been for years in Chile

I'd say it's a success?

But is that really all Pinochet, though?

america's idealogy of markets, freedom, and individualism made you rich and powerful very quickly but it also brought you to the brink of destruction

Not really

america is 56% white at best, and your demographic destiny cannto be reversed without a conflict

I don't think thats much of a problem anyways

but onto markets

Shen BapiroToday at 18:46
But is that really all Pinochet, though?

what do you mean?

I was sort of shifting the conversation over to pinochet rather than free markets, albeit unintentionally

I don't think the free market has failed

It can't anyways

the best way to allocate resources

Like look at Hong Kong

Japan

Singapore

Ireland etc

Like Ireland got 20% gdp growth in 2015 Q1

Top 5 freest economies in the world

so you are okay with whites going extinct

how many more generations will your country remain majority white?

one thing about some of these free economies, sweden isn't on this list but i'll use it as an example

they have less regulation than most countries, but have welfare states