Message from @Decay
Discord ID: 531145421683294228
I am in the middle
But I don’t like him because he Middle Eastern
@Deli.v2 Maybe it is not Assad who's using gas, but it can't be noone. Forensic Surgeons have examined many dead bodies, to see if gas is used in war. In almost all of the bodies that the FSs picked, there was a high amount of poisonous gas' toxicity. That confirms, that gas is indeed used in the war. Now about Assad, he is definitely not a cool, or nice person. You have a point in what you say, but the likelihood of him using gas against the Syrian rebels is terribly big, since in battles that the Syrian army has fought, against both Syrian rebels and ISIS, a significantly big minority of the dead bodies died by some poisonous-like gas/toxicity which was found into their bodies, after they were carefully examined by forensic surgeons. I really don't know what to believe - the Middle East war is a free-for-all game. Everyone is against everyone. I think we should wait for the war to finish, which is going to finish soon, and then we can really find out who uses that poisonous gas.
Now, Assad is definitely not a Middle East's, New Hitler dictator. He is partially evil, and cruel, but there are several leaders that are much worse than him, such as Erdoğan, and that definetely not virgin Iranian muslim dictator.
are these the same forensic scientists that touched gas attack bodies without actual hazmat suits? Or is this a different investigation
if sarin was deployed you are fucked if you touch a body or get too close with nothing on.
Different investigation, most likely.
From what i know only the UN and US sent investigators
generally no evidence was found, those who said evidence was found were filmed with latex gloves and basic sterile masks
> He is partially evil, and cruel
"Evil and cruel" doing what needs to be done to protect your people and keep the country together. Far too often effective leaders are labeled as mean by softies. The country still exists, no? There wasn't a head-chopper bloodbath. The various religious minorities have been protected from the Islamists. The rightful leader has maintained power and not been unjustly run off. He didn't flee, he stayed amid the war and defended. He isn't evil at all, he is effective, but you can't deal with the menace he has faced with kid gloves.
Exactly^
^
Read this.
It's better for you to read the source itself, rather than me trying to explain to you.
Cruel, and evil enough.
>(((UN)))
Yeah, buddy, we're still waiting for the trusted source...
IMO, all the (((Syrian rebels))) should be bombed on the spot.
Assad successfully destroyed Syria, economically, and politically.
And he successfully won the war, despite him committing terrible war crimes.
>Civil war destroyed the economy
bruh
The civil war destroyed the economy more.
He rightfully won the war
He did.
He's the only good leader left in the middle east
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAAHAHA
Nobody's good in the middle east.
THE ONLY GOOD LEADER
HAHAHAAHHAAAAA
Saddam and Ghadafy both got Jewed
oof
Assad is the only good leader left
You've been infected by the shills, mate. "War crimes" report from the UN and that's it. Might as well have not posted it. UN should be abolished as it is, and these "war crimes" charges are incredibly dubious. Same as before, softies bemoan a strong leader doing what's needed to secure his people. You'd have rather Syria be destroyed and the headchoppers get their bloodbath so that this UN hit-piece and/or "war crimes" didn't occur. It makes no sense.
Assad didn't destroy the economy. He had done a lot to help and maintain it, but what can you expect when the West invaded their neighbor in 2003, having Israel to their SouthWest, clearly an international plot to destroy Syria, global financial crisis in 08, and global warming having a severe impact.
For another example and the alternative outcome to what has taken place in Syria, let's look at Libya. Gaddafi was taking steps to help ALL Africa. A continent that so badly needs self-improvement, Gaddafi was trying to lead that. He was keeping the African invasion from flooding Europe. And he maintained a degree of healthy control.
But the rightful ruler was massacred which is already a threat to sovereignty. The pan-African efforts were destroyed. Libya was left destrabalized and with partial Islamist rule. The African flooding of Europe was allowed to accelerate greatly. And now you have OPEN AIR SLAVE MARKETS in Libya.
If "war crimes" could have prevented all that 2nd paragraph and allowed us to carry on from somewhere like the direction of the first, I care not one bit about whatever the outside, corrupting, destroying force wants to label it. The same beast labeling it "war crimes" is the same beast that can't seem to stop causing an absolute mess across the globe and won't let us get on in any sort of sensible way.
(The UN's investigation into the gassings was demonstrated by almost all third parties that dont really have a say, to be retarded and brutally false. the UN has had it out for Assad the day the war started.)
The only war crimes assad has commited is not killing all rebels on sight with no quarter.
^
the thing i like about assad is that he has an unveiled and attractive wife
Uh...
thing I like about Assad is that no reason the western powers Ganges on him