Message from @Decay
Discord ID: 531145609995091970
From what i know only the UN and US sent investigators
generally no evidence was found, those who said evidence was found were filmed with latex gloves and basic sterile masks
> He is partially evil, and cruel
"Evil and cruel" doing what needs to be done to protect your people and keep the country together. Far too often effective leaders are labeled as mean by softies. The country still exists, no? There wasn't a head-chopper bloodbath. The various religious minorities have been protected from the Islamists. The rightful leader has maintained power and not been unjustly run off. He didn't flee, he stayed amid the war and defended. He isn't evil at all, he is effective, but you can't deal with the menace he has faced with kid gloves.
Exactly^
^
Read this.
It's better for you to read the source itself, rather than me trying to explain to you.
Cruel, and evil enough.
>(((UN)))
Yeah, buddy, we're still waiting for the trusted source...
IMO, all the (((Syrian rebels))) should be bombed on the spot.
Assad successfully destroyed Syria, economically, and politically.
And he successfully won the war, despite him committing terrible war crimes.
>Assad destroyed the economy
>Civil war destroyed the economy
bruh
The civil war destroyed the economy more.
He rightfully won the war
He did.
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAAHAHA
Nobody's good in the middle east.
THE ONLY GOOD LEADER
HAHAHAAHHAAAAA
Saddam and Ghadafy both got Jewed
oof
Assad is the only good leader left
You've been infected by the shills, mate. "War crimes" report from the UN and that's it. Might as well have not posted it. UN should be abolished as it is, and these "war crimes" charges are incredibly dubious. Same as before, softies bemoan a strong leader doing what's needed to secure his people. You'd have rather Syria be destroyed and the headchoppers get their bloodbath so that this UN hit-piece and/or "war crimes" didn't occur. It makes no sense.
Assad didn't destroy the economy. He had done a lot to help and maintain it, but what can you expect when the West invaded their neighbor in 2003, having Israel to their SouthWest, clearly an international plot to destroy Syria, global financial crisis in 08, and global warming having a severe impact.
For another example and the alternative outcome to what has taken place in Syria, let's look at Libya. Gaddafi was taking steps to help ALL Africa. A continent that so badly needs self-improvement, Gaddafi was trying to lead that. He was keeping the African invasion from flooding Europe. And he maintained a degree of healthy control.
But the rightful ruler was massacred which is already a threat to sovereignty. The pan-African efforts were destroyed. Libya was left destrabalized and with partial Islamist rule. The African flooding of Europe was allowed to accelerate greatly. And now you have OPEN AIR SLAVE MARKETS in Libya.
If "war crimes" could have prevented all that 2nd paragraph and allowed us to carry on from somewhere like the direction of the first, I care not one bit about whatever the outside, corrupting, destroying force wants to label it. The same beast labeling it "war crimes" is the same beast that can't seem to stop causing an absolute mess across the globe and won't let us get on in any sort of sensible way.
(The UN's investigation into the gassings was demonstrated by almost all third parties that dont really have a say, to be retarded and brutally false. the UN has had it out for Assad the day the war started.)
The only war crimes assad has commited is not killing all rebels on sight with no quarter.
the thing i like about assad is that he has an unveiled and attractive wife
Uh...
thing I like about Assad is that no reason the western powers Ganges on him
turned something that was small into huge like my cock
Ok N*rd
Drug dealers and drug users are different people. However, drug dealers and suppliers should be executed. Unironically, don't care what the reason is. be it poverty or corruption.
I support using the army, instead of police or swat, to take care of drug dealers and suppliers, much more efficient.
and instead of trying to take them alive and risking good men, just shoot them on sight. And reinstate bounties for drug dealers, like a $1000 reward if you kill a drug dealer. Now, with so much pressure on drug dealers, i'd give them a way out, if you get to a police station, and turn your self in, you'll be given rehab and reintegrated. but if you're caught or killed before you get there, tough shit.
opinion?
The wave of drug addiction that's sweeping the western world has very little to do with a 'degeneration' of 'societal values' but is rooted in very specific causes with very specific players. We have medical institutions that allow people to suffer chronic pain and do nothing to help them solve the issue, and in many cases, are prompted by pharmaceutical companies to prescribe dangerous opioids which only make the situation worse. Instead of dealing with the smaller issue, the entrepreneuring spirit of the people who fill in these gaps between supply and demand, deal with the source of the problem, the behaviors of predatory pharma companies.
As for drug use more broadly, why waste the effort? Drugs are fun. Drugs are useful. They play a fascinating role in shaping both group dynamics and pushing past the boundaries of the normal. Hell, even Evola did his share of psychs. The only thing that broadly opposing the use of drugs does is help enforce a regime of physical and psychological normalcy that only benefits a neoliberal, globalist order which seeks to impose universality by force.
If people fuck themselves up on drugs, they've only got themselves to blame. But why should the fear that the weak might damage themselves prevent exceptional individuals from pushing boundaries?