"Rome was so weak"

I mean Rome was destroyed by barbarians

yeah you're right they were a husk at the end

Well, just after their high point.

they had a good run though

the best yet

not hte best yet

look at hte british empire

theyve had the best civilizational run so far in humanities history

800 years. Well, Christianity and Islam had better but anyways

british empire did less for themselves and for the world

but

they civilized the majority of humanity

lmao

Westernised brutal cultures

temporarily *maybe*

they just didnt have enough time to finish it

Roman conquests and puppets were technologically and culturally improved for all time

Well, "brutality" is a very relative term. It is masculine.

British colonies reverted to savage backwardness immediately

I think we all see a problem with this

Lol, what problem?

Draco where do you stand politically

looks to me like he means that brutality is necessary to some ddegree in any successful culture

I am a Right Winger, I guess., because I mean I am not a liberal or a leftist

just take this test yh

http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/

those tests are spooks

its not 100% accurate

but it gives other people an idea

https://www.politicalcompass.org/test/en

This one is literally 2 points

economic

and government

authoritarian or anarchistic governments

Controlled or free Economic systems

No, what I mean is this - Cultures, as they gain more wealth and prosperity became more and more feminine from masculine.
The high point of culture is when they are a mix of feminine and masculine in a good ratio. However, once cultures become civilised, they continue that feminisation and reach a point like West has today

ok

now i see

but