Those aren't the majority of monopolizing features

@Bogatyr Bogumir then thing stopping a monopoly is competition

Completion forms with low barriers to entry

competition eventually produces a winner

That’s why the state needs to stop intervention

You argue dishonestly as if the capitalism s not ingrained with state power on purpose

No they just compete

lol

^

Competition doesn't do anything

Because the capitalism you speak of doesn’t exist and the state isn’t a thing in capitalism

Yes it does

G2g

Be back in a bit

The state is the entirety of capitalism

How is it the entirety of capitalism?

Capitalism is a very self-looking system, bringing freedom to the individuals.

The state isn't of primary importance in the Capitalist System's markets.

Capitalism did not become engendered until the English Gentry took land from communal peasants and used a process of enclosure on it

Capitalism is not natural

No part of modern civilization is "natural"

^

Modern civilization is the result of capitalism

modern civilization and capitalism are the result of technological advance

Not true

True.

I guess that's not true then lmao

Naturalism doesn't let the technology evolve that fast.

Technological advancements in itself do not push towards capitalism

sure they do

capitalism is the most sensible way to leverage wealth, and wealth only proliferates through technological advances to production efficiency

there is no way to actually stop this, competition literally fails eventually as a system itself, eventually someone gets more money through whatver methods. And he then raises the bar, he can afford to give better wages, literally competition is the reason a monopoly must rise.

literally the best economies in the world also practice protectionism, those that have employed persons that is. Switzerland has seasonal tariffs and somehow people are okay with it, otherwise their farmers would literally be replaced by some company from germany or china who knows.

The moment you dont even produce your own food, your own oil you are the vassal of whatever company produces said product. Libertarianism not only fails to explain away monopolies, issues concerning the nation becoming literally a company are also not explained away, additionally the social consequences. There is a fine line to walk and libertarianism essentially abandones the rules in favor of such basic and ambiguous rules that anything can happen including monopolies, the law of competition mandates it.

Rather when there is a set of rules and set of methods by which welath actually flows constantly and prevents pooling, libertarianism isnt this system but rather a system of the buisnussman. We need something that limits certain things, such as how many X more a CEO makes than the person on the floor. Ironically the era of major growth in germany etc. had these inds of laws, the moment they were removed in favor of loosening up the economy things went to shit. And ever since the wages have spiraled downwards. (not to mention libertarianism opens the perfect oppertunity for corrupting govorment and gaining competetive advantage... there is nothing in libertarianism preventing this).

jesus

Advancements in power, electrical and productive, turns toward planning and a national centralization of economic affairs

Not quite capitalist

I agree, I'm not a libertarian @Bogatyr Bogumir

@el pebble you are right that capitalism requires the deliberate support of the state through contract enforcement and other enabling laws

but it is no more artificial than any other government support economic system

it's just a decentralized approach

It's the epitome of artificial

The ability for one to claim the piece of a world for profit and exploit values of labor through the primacy of wage labor has never been natural