It seems to me like you're deciding more with a "Just so" distinction than along racial lines

but if races were real and not just humans trying to find patterns in data to support their biases

then they would be clear and discrete

picture unrelated

ethnicity has what to do with race again?

did he ever say anything to that effect?

i never brought ethnicity into this i just pointed to other cultures disagreeing on racial categorization

@DA GOMMIE JOO

>main ethnic groups

but how do these ethnic groupings arise?

if you looked further down

they're racially motivated

>when you read the title and then ignore everything else

he brought up something titled ethnicity which was pretty irrelevant. I do not know enough about brazil to know regarding what lines they consider races or in general.

but think about this, in a world where there are international organizations that standardize the production of tea for research wouldn't they standardize the racial groupings across borders for scientific research?

>when the other guy cites a diagram disproving you so you focus on the title of the diagram

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103

but it didnt disprove me lmao

if racial groupings are objectively scientific then why isn't there an international standard in the science community for what racial groupings there are 😆

kek

Because thats not politically correct

BecAusE ThAt'S Not POlITcAlLY cOrRECt

but the medical benefits behind it would be vast

Muh scientific authorities isnt an argument

I thought we were arguing wether race exist not where the specific line goes between races and how many there exist

"the scientific community censors things based on whether they're PC or not"
>completely misunderstands how science works

but races are literally the categorizations of human genetic variation

if there is no clear specific line than there is no true 'objective' grouping of races it's a pointless and futile endeavor.

it suggests our current understanding of race is motivated by something else other than science

Because those lines arent officially drawn

'because they aren't officially drawn'
because there's no scientific reason to do so

We can still make distinctions between groups

which are unscientific

so are useless and pointless

and politically motivated

so why can't anyone agree on where the lines even are if they exist

and social constructions

Muh scientific authorities

It doesnt matter that its socially constructed

it does

social constructs by definition do not exist