and mind you

even if it is

like you say it is

the soviet union still had wages

now i know

You miss the point

youre going to say if youre a doctor earns wages in the ussr it's ok because he "owns the production"

yet he doesnt

How so?

Sure he does

he does only on papaer.

*paper

in practice he owns nothing

this democratic ownership is a falsehood

he can't take a machine from a hospital and put it in his own home

That's what you think

no that's what I know

Yes he can't because he's not the only owner

when everybody is the owner

no one is

The car is owned by all the people

WHAT

That’s a paradoxical statement

screaming "WHAT" while your soy is about to spill wont retract from the point that i made

the car cant be owned by all people

because people had locks

you couldnt take another man's car

you couldnt go into another man's house

Ambulance car is public property owned by all people

just because you *say* it was public, does not make it so

it is owned by the state

not by the people

by the people is a fancy, populist phrase that people love to use

And another man's car and house are PERSONAL, not private or public property

it is not so in actuality

In a true state of the people, it would be owned by the people.

^

ah of course

true

And it was in the USSR

here we go