Message from @Advocatus Diaboli
Discord ID: 450718829933363221
In a true state of the people, it would be owned by the people.
^
ah of course
true
And it was in the USSR
here we go
not true communism
as always
word masturbation from post modernist idiots
Pls differ socialism from communism
Communism is stateless
Social ownership
well then the ussr wasnt communism
now was it
The USSR was socialist
^
I actually just got done explaining this in the fascist channel since these goys don't have a firm understanding of communism.
On the other hand the USSR was not legitimate socialism. The worker was made a slave to the state.
Just because something is publicly owned doesn't mean you really own it. Everything was subordinated to the state.
The USSR was brutally repressive in all of the wrong ways and economically mismanaged itself into collapse.
Please put in mind that Khrushchev, Brezhnev and Gorbachev conducted economical reforms that disrupted the economy
that is beside the point
people were slaves to the state under lenin and stalin and trotsky
>under trotsky
Slaves?
You can't make the whole population slaves whilst maintaining the most effective education system in the world
>this level of delusion
STFU nazi, you're not the one to talk about slavery
The Soviet education system was "effective"? Holy fuck no it was not.
1917 - 17% literacy
1957 - first artificial satellite
It was effective at boosting literacy. Congrats the USSR achieved parity with the rest of the world. But the Soviet education system was marred by nepotism and rapid ideologism.
Read The Truth That Killed by Georgi Markov to know what the Eastern Bloc was really like.
You're crazy deluded.
@Advocatus Diaboli stfu yourself faggot. There was no slavery under NatSocialism
ACKTUALLY
Ostarbeiter
@Advocatus Diaboli non-citizens
@εïз irma εïз I'm from Ukrainian teacher family, I know what I'm talking about
USSR enslaved its own
it sure doesnt seem like you do
Enslaving anyone is bad, even non-citizens