Also Codreanu got btfo'd.

True but you could say the same about natsoc, and natsyn.

National syndicalism is applicable anywhere.

Why is fascism modeled after the iron guard not applicable anywhere else to you?

Sorel didn't write within the context of France. The critiques of democratic socialism and general strikes aren't exclusive to France.

Because a lot of the Iron Guard's political issues were Romania-specific.

Yes.

But we could model movements outside romania after it.

Anything out of Romania is kind of garbage honestly.

Unless it's the rightfully Hungarian region of Transylvania.

There's a lot of things that you can take from the Iron Guard and from For My Legionnaires, same with most fascist literature.

It's generally the same just with some ethnic issues added in or issues specific to the nation of origin.

^

you must learn all forms of fascism have the same core

Atomwaffen division should be renamed sperg division lmao.

Iron Guard was uniquely clerical.

No.

AWD need to be line up and shot.

but they have different external properties to fit the need of the nation

It was clerical and racial.

I didn't say it wasn't racial.

I just said it was uniquely clerical.

Most other clerical fascists weren't racial.

Such as fatherland front

and francoism

@Mitch yea: militarism and totalitarianism

Franco a fascist? 🤔

First thing he did was betray the fascists.

Franco was a capitalist

and fatherland front wasn't really fascist

Franco was just another lukewarm vanilla dictator who sat on his ass and did nothing.

Abandoned the fascist facade as soon as it was no longer in vogue.

he lasted longer than most fascists

True he was more of just a military dictator.

you have to give him that

And fatherland front is corporatist and ultranationalist

as well as a one party state

Salazar was better than Franco.

lol

no helicopter jokes

pinochet was a capitalist