You mean the bourgeoisie?

4 majors? That's pretty dumb.

it's useful to be interdisciplinary in things that matter

it lets me make things

new things

rather than wallow in filth

Yeah, it's also leads you to ascribe to fascism. And I highly doubt you'll invent something which will change the world. In fact, I'm almost positive you won't.

and im 100% sure you won't

I don't need to change the world; I will contribute to making the world a better place. I stand on the shoulders of giants and I will help prop up the next generations.
You, you will pull supports out

>studying something that actually matters makes you a fascist
🤔

And? I don't have to worry about inventing something as that isn't of interest to me. I write and read theory. My mark on the world will arise out of the field of theoretical research.

By spreading false info?

>I'm important because I am capable of meta-analysis
literally everyone does this

you're just a fool that might one day get paid to shill your communist propaganda

once again
YOU, @Deleted User , ARE A **/COFFEE SHOP LEFTIST/**

>sociologist trying to shit on engineers

fucking LOL

@Lotus Calme Yeah, because sociology is all meta-analysis, right? No, I don't think so. And at least my communist propaganda is capable of being taken far more seriously than your fascist bullshit as it accounts for concrete material conditions. My ideology is predicated on a systematic, methodological analysis of social and economic relations. Yours is all about muh h'white babies and idealistic nonsense.

Remember that many medical discoveries were made in the concentration camps

I would expect someone without a background in the social sciences to buy into such non-analytical claptrap. This isn't robotics.

Race can be relevant to those analysis

You just reject its importance

You wanna talk about social and economic relations? That's my specialty, big boy.

@karbon I'm also not seriously against engineers or anyone that fulfills a useful and productive role in society. Nor do I hate STEM majors. It's just banter lol.

ah
lmao

@Deleted User
>my ideology is taken more seriously
My "comrade", don't you see, Europe is no longer Red. The Chancellor is dead. And Europe is turning its eyes to its dear, beloved history.
The time of the Dark Enlightenment nears everyday, we are winning; you are not.
My ideology is based on the analysis of Natural Laws and the application of hard science to humanity, yours is an ideology made by a NEET; Karl Marx didn't live a day of hardship, had no connection with the people, and he had a poor understanding of economics.

I would not also be surprised if you, being a /coffee shop leftist/ also haven't had a hard day in your life.
Have you worked on a farm? A factory? Have you even worked?

98% of the ones I've met though couldn't even understand the first chapter of Das Kapital Vol. I.

Answer his question

Have you?

Why the fuck are people voting against a nationalist party. Don't you communists and liberals want to split the fash?

Inb4 communism can be attained through nationalism

Why are you giving them that idea alex

It pretty much has, every time

Lol

He’s a spy

Because nationalist party>fascist party. Fascism is the next best thing.

Maybe

global socialism
vs
***national socialism***

Nationalist is true

@Lotus Calme "Natural Laws" are nothing more than bullshit abstraction that no-one with a philosophically-refined mind can take seriously. You're also never going to be able to "apply" any of the natural sciences to the study of human society and human behavior. Ever. That's just more biologically-reductionist and physicalist bullshit from you, Mr. Roboto. And how did Karl Marx not have a connection to the people? Pretty sure you haven't read a single biography of him. As for your claim that he had a "poor" understanding of economics, you couldn't possibly be more wrong. His critique of the capitalist mode of production is still just as relevant today as it was when he first wrote it, and you won't find a serious economist that believes otherwise, regardless of political affiliation. I think you would also be surprised that much of what he wrote is just now being "discovered" by heterodox economists. Lel

Fascism is just making money because of fascism