(((They))) want you to support 2 because it gives a break to nonhomestead properties but they want 1 blocked because it protects homestead properties

So basically they are shilling for people that rent out their properties to minorities while trying to fuck over people who live in their homes

I'll make an official list of positions.

actually I should send it to FLanon for approval

Normally I’d advocate for giving a tax cut to homestead properties but it would fuck over local governments

so that’s why I advocate for a no vote on 1 AND 2

I’d also say yes for 9 but that isn’t a conservative or nationalist position, I’m just an environmental fag who also hates degeneracy

@Nuke that would be great, and I’m happy to help out with that. Especially for all the local shit noone cares about besides me

What's the wording of the environmental question?

it basically bans offshore drilling and also bans vaping at workplaces

I’ll get you the exact wording

One sec

A conscience vote on that should be fine. I have mixed opinions.

Balancing environmental protection with energy independence from the backwoods failed states on which America is presently dependent is a difficult balance to strike.

Vote by mail is at 43.9% R, 38% D, and 17% no party affiliation.

I think Florida has plenty of other resources it can rely on to become energy independent

also I believe that our state should prioritize protecting our own

There is also an amendment that I think prevents chinks from buying all our land

So that is worthy of our support imo

@FLanon Florida, ballot measure endorsements:
1. YES
2. YES
3. YES
4. NO
5. YES
6. YES
7. YES
8. YES (not on ballot)
9. YES
10. NO
11. NO
12. YES
13. NO

@[Lex] here’s the ballotpedia page https://ballotpedia.org/Florida_Amendment_9,_Ban_Offshore_Oil_and_Gas_Drilling_and_Ban_Vaping_in_Enclosed_Indoor_Workplaces_Amendment_(2018)

Thoughts?

9 is really the worst one.

There's a group called "SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION" saying to vote NO on everything

because 9 is just so blatantly intended to tie together two unrelated issues, among other things

They actually make a point of how they're ridiculous consolidations.

Or arbitrarily separated

@Nuke no on 1 and 2, I know it’s a conservative perspective to want lower taxes but 1 keeps local governments from losing money and 2 is super kiked and meant to save out of state property owners their shekels

9 is retarded I agree

Yeah I think 9 is going to fail just because people will go "wtf?"

1 and 2. well

My main concern is 4 yep

Vote as you please. I'm just trying to hit the most right-wing views possible.

Also yeah the main concern is 4.

4 is a solid no

Although I did vote No on 9 because that one is just plain fuckin weird

Attaching two separate issues to the same ballot initiative is just fishy

I can understand voting no on 1, 2, 9 and a few others

fuck vapers tbh

Also, oil drilling? Seriously?

3 yes