Message from @ThatRightWingFish

Discord ID: 448567720183595008


2018-05-22 18:44:21 UTC  

again, this is why your analysis is elementary af

2018-05-22 18:44:34 UTC  

it would not suppress right wing turnout, it would increase it

2018-05-22 18:44:58 UTC  

learn to actually think properly about politics

2018-05-22 18:45:20 UTC  

arguably, it would increase left wing turnout and may persuade independents to vote D, but it would not suppress right wing turnout

2018-05-22 18:45:30 UTC  

jeeze....

2018-05-22 18:48:09 UTC  

ahahahahahahah

2018-05-22 18:53:09 UTC  

@Deleted User >mfw my elementary analyses is proven right if we lose seats in 2018

2018-05-22 18:53:38 UTC  

Call your opponents uninformed, or wrong, but call them stupid-

2018-05-22 18:53:47 UTC  

Really hurts when they win

2018-05-22 18:54:44 UTC  

If you look at history, it has successfully suppressed right wing turnout before

2018-05-22 18:55:15 UTC  

The left uses shootings a moral club against right wingers, they say "if you don't support gun control its because you care about your gun more than the lives of children."

2018-05-22 18:55:43 UTC  

Very similar strategy to how they got public support for the Gun Control Act under Carter and the Federal Semi Auto ban under Clinton.

2018-05-22 18:56:50 UTC  

So if you took a moment for some historical analysis and some critical thinking, Mr. Non-elementary, you can already see it having been used before, and being successful.

2018-05-22 18:59:18 UTC  

It's most effective at swaying independents, but it also has suppressed right wing turnout

2018-05-22 19:19:14 UTC  

@๐ŸŽƒBoo-ton๐ŸŽƒ post map of the states who keep a white majority for years to come please

2018-05-22 19:25:48 UTC  

@ThatRightWingFish how many years are we talking about here? 2060? or another 50 years after?

2018-05-22 19:26:02 UTC  

I think it was 50

2018-05-22 19:26:04 UTC  

Idk

2018-05-22 19:26:11 UTC  

I remembering seeing it

2018-05-22 19:27:58 UTC  

Thanks

2018-05-22 19:39:36 UTC  

@zakattack04 no, even if the D's win, your analysis is still wrong

2018-05-22 19:39:44 UTC  

because they'll win for different reasons

2018-05-22 19:46:14 UTC  

RS: If we lose, it'll be because we didn't trigger the SJWs hard enough

2018-05-22 20:06:33 UTC  

uh, no

2018-05-22 20:06:38 UTC  

it'll be because of a variety of factors

2018-05-22 20:06:52 UTC  

keep in mind that "triggering the SJWs" is a legit motivation for some

2018-05-22 20:09:32 UTC  

@Deleted User I'm shocked that the (((Krassenstein))) brothers are scam artists

2018-05-22 20:14:48 UTC  

@Deleted User um no sweetie, only motivation for you.

2018-05-22 20:15:10 UTC  

Button and I get motivated by more intellectual factors

2018-05-22 20:15:49 UTC  

>more intellectual factors

like trying to not burn to death due to drought fires ?

2018-05-22 20:16:01 UTC  

Hey

2018-05-22 20:16:11 UTC  

The fires are burning Browns too

2018-05-22 20:17:23 UTC  

In California, we all welcome death.

2018-05-22 20:49:39 UTC  

I saw that shooting in Florida, why does this always happen at the worst times.

2018-05-22 21:07:28 UTC  

House Races to Watch today:
GA-06 Turnout
GA-07 Turnout
AR-02
TX-07 dem primary
TX-23 dem primary
TX-32

2018-05-22 21:08:16 UTC  

KY-06 too

2018-05-22 21:09:41 UTC  

yeah for the dem primary

2018-05-22 21:09:41 UTC  

๐Ÿ†™ | **Walter Johnson leveled up!**

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/448593318105055266/levelup.png

2018-05-22 21:09:49 UTC  

but isn't that a safe red seat?

2018-05-22 21:10:14 UTC  

nvm its lean Republican