neither of us get what we think happens

GOP losing a few seats in the House, but not enough to lose their majority

Lol statistically impossible

elections are a terrible example of a binary thing

*around* the same

GOP gains a few seats in the Senate, but not enough for a supermajority

What if NJ goes red

It's a lose then

It wont

That would be cool

it may

Nope.

Why

Trends.

@ThatRightWingFish NJ going red would be so beautiful in a year that the left has designated for le blue wave

muh drendz

fuck off

Every time we see one poll that helps us, we get so happy, but all the other ones our response is "muh they're just polls"

Can't have it both ways

according to trends, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania were impossible to win

What?

we can

according to zak's trendz argument, we should have lost in 2010, 2014, and 2016

Polls are either reliable or they're not

Nope

Are you talking about you idiot

we can see what opportunities may arise

the rust belt states we're winnable@because of their economic makeup

while not giving up on lower results

....

Industrial states

we can have it both ways

Lost jobs too poor trade policy which trump ran on

But

But

No you can't ducking have t both ways, polls either apply or they dont

"Every time we see one poll that helps us, we get so happy, but all the other ones our response is "muh they're just polls""

no, when I see a poll that favors us, I argue that it shows that polls aren't supporting the left's narrative as much as they want. Polls favoring GOP are not to be trusted either

don't put words in our mouth

they do but we shouldn't shut down opportunities because of it

basically, if one subscribes to the idea that polls are super reliable, then they have to accept GOP favored polls as well

this has revealed a new opportunity to us

now, I don't view them as reliable, ergo I'm not "happy" when I see them come out in our favor