Message from @herm-3x-gr8
Discord ID: 468484598205251584
I think they're just really naïve about cyber attacks. This is probably the first time in their lives that they've heard about the US being cyber attacked by a foreign nation. They don't realize that we're engaged in daily constant cyber war with every other 1st world nation on the planet and pretty much all the participants have agreed with each other that kinetic retaliation is out of the question.
So Is the Russian summit over?
I only woke up an hour and a half ago
> Diplomacy is a bad thing now
Unless we’re at war with Russia, Drumpf is considered a Russian agent I guess
Even if we were at war with Russia
They would be anally wrecked.
TRUMP CALLED OUT IMRAN AWAN AT PUTIN PRESS CONFERENCE
YUGE!!!!
@herm-3x-gr8 Antifa actually likes guns my dude
?
@herm-3x-gr8 they have groups that shoot in the woods etc
Training camps look up redneck revolt as an example
They are shoddily trained
Right wing militias are better in almost every way
Have you seen them shoot
Poor trigger discipline and posture
Not to mention most of them are effeminate males and women
They spook people, that’s it
There's two types of antifa. The skinny soyim trans fags, and the skinny soyim trans fags with rifles.
And its the latter that worries me.
Good news is that the armed ones are the minority.
But seeing as how cville went. Even a small amount of them can cause chaos
>Putin said:
>For instance, we can bring up Mr. Browder in this particular case. Business >associates of Mr. Browder have earned over one and a half billion dollars in >Russia. They never paid any taxes, neither in Russian army in the United States >and yet the money escaped the country, they were transferred to the United >States.
>They sent huge amount of money - 400 million - as a contribution to the
>campaign of Hillary Clinton.
>Well, that's their personal case, it might have been legal, the contribution itself,
>but the way the money was earned was illegal.
>So we have a solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers
>accompanied and guided these transactions. So we have an interest of
>questioning them. That can be a first step and we can also extend it.
>Options abound.
from todays presser with putin and trump
@R E P T I L E#2857 thisb
links to news in new and media
I know it’s probably not going to be a huge topic of discussion but any chance of getting a channel for local elections?
wew, thats a tough one
Yeah
On one hand it’s a lot to cover
On the other hand it is probably the easiest to control the results of
Also many local elections are nonpartisan
yeah we are too small and to spread out for local i think
and we really want to focus on keeping the house and senate
local elections dont have the same impact
gubernatorial, yes, but local is too much data, too many people, and really isnt done online.
I get your point with that, but state and local elections do have significance, just look at California. Instead of ruling it out entirely I think having a channel for discussion of the subject and data focusing on locales which are most likely to be able to be converted would be the best bet.
Discussing local elections in NYC would be a waste of time but other places aren’t lost causes.
im all for a discussion, but i can guess with almost certainty it wont happen, and if its attempted on here will not succeed. we really need to focus our energy where it is most needed, and atm that is not in local elections.
Hi all for a discussion, but i can guess with almost certainty it wont happen, and if its attempted on here will not succeed. we really need to focus our energy where it is most needed, and atm that is not in local elections., I'm Dad!
Fair enough
we do gubernatorial, and there is a state section for each state