Message from @FLanon

Discord ID: 402283560347893761


2018-01-15 02:03:14 UTC  

Trump's approval in the most vulnerable districts:

2018-01-15 02:03:16 UTC  

Competitive Republican House Seats: 15
1. Arizona-2 (42%)/California-25 (36%)/New Jersey-2 (45%)
2. California-39 (41%)
3. California-48 (50%)
4. California-49 (45%)
5. Colorado-6 (37%)
6. Florida-26 (41%)
7. Florida-27 (48%)
8. Minnesota-2 (42%)
9. Nebraska-2 (43%)
10. New York-19 (35%)
11. New York-22 (41%)
12. Texas-7 (41%)
13. Texas-23 (37%)
14. Virginia-10 (46%)
15. Washington-8 (33%)

2018-01-15 02:03:40 UTC  

I'm pushing to make the demographics better too, I'm not blind, but as for ethnostates where there's strict rules for who is allowed to stay and who gets deported isn't going to realistically happen

2018-01-15 02:04:10 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 This begs the question...how do we know these polls are sampled properly?

2018-01-15 02:04:26 UTC  

I'd say pushing family values back onto families, and having an immigration system similar to pre-'65 is how I'd put us back on track

2018-01-15 02:04:41 UTC  

in the Alabama election, there was a poll right before that said Jones would win by 10% (far from it) and another that said Moore would win by 10% (nope)

2018-01-15 02:05:05 UTC  

I wouldn't trust polls since they can be very ambiguous.

2018-01-15 02:05:11 UTC  

@FLanon yeah, that makes much more sense than "hurr, let's import the entire third world...and then we're GUARANTEED to win!"

2018-01-15 02:05:17 UTC  

data's better than no data, that's how I see it

2018-01-15 02:05:38 UTC  

yeah, but the question is...how do you use data to make decisions ?

2018-01-15 02:05:51 UTC  

whether or not Trump is popular in those districts, we still need to put as much effort in as possible

2018-01-15 02:05:59 UTC  

now, you could argue that we should ignore safe red and safe blue areas

2018-01-15 02:06:02 UTC  

that's true

2018-01-15 02:06:11 UTC  

but it's hard to tell what's truly 'safe'

2018-01-15 02:07:08 UTC  

tbh the Media should just tell what each politicians' voting record is instead of shoving polls saying who is in the lead, so people can make decisiosn based on policy not advancing whatever politician is ahead

2018-01-15 02:07:38 UTC  

pollsters should ask voters what politicians should do differently

2018-01-15 02:07:44 UTC  

the media doesn't care about democracy and making voters informed

2018-01-15 02:08:25 UTC  

they're in cahoots with a lot of them, wikileaks showed this

2018-01-15 02:10:47 UTC  

I can understand turning to more radical means if things collapse...but voting for people for the purpose of making things collapse is so retarded

2018-01-15 02:11:09 UTC  

not only are you not guaranteed to win, you're also not guaranteed to cause the collapse as quickly as you might want

2018-01-15 02:11:14 UTC  

if it happens, but not to make it happen deliberately

2018-01-15 02:11:24 UTC  

exactly

2018-01-15 02:11:31 UTC  

there's better ways of going at it

2018-01-15 02:12:25 UTC  

if we had better margins in the house and senate, we'd have a) a wall b) a better immigration policy, literally fixes the country in generations

2018-01-15 02:12:43 UTC  

maybe the 4plebs result for 'accelerationism' is skewed because only the dumbasses who support it will use the term, but there seems to be a significant amount of /pol/lacks who think it's a proper strategy

2018-01-15 02:13:45 UTC  

I just can't figure out why anyone would want this kind of shit unless you do nothing but sit and watch gladiator movies your whole life

2018-01-15 02:13:56 UTC  

it's so cartoony

2018-01-15 02:15:05 UTC  

I'm looking through the archives right now

2018-01-15 02:15:16 UTC  

apparently Varg wanted it back when the French election was happening

2018-01-15 02:15:45 UTC  

I remember people saying that Macron winning was 'good' because Le Pen would give the kind of 'kosher nationalism' that Trump was giving which "isn't working"

2018-01-15 02:16:40 UTC  

lmao didn't her dad say the lampshades were something of history or something of that effect?

2018-01-15 02:17:27 UTC  

you've got to be pragmatic, that's how you do it

2018-01-15 02:17:51 UTC  

there's multiple ways you can bring the country back to our favor, not just by setting it on fire

2018-01-15 02:18:28 UTC  

that's like social keynesianism

2018-01-15 02:18:47 UTC  

If we can get the Immigration Act of 1924 reinstated all our problems will be solved

2018-01-15 02:19:08 UTC  

exactly

2018-01-15 02:19:18 UTC  

RAISE can fix so much shit

2018-01-15 02:19:52 UTC  

"
Blackpilled accelerationists are the ghetto niggers of nationalism. They haven't accomplished anything for decades but whenever there's a hint of even a fraction of what they want being normalized they lash out, because if it isn't 100% of what they want they feel betrayed and change takes actual effort while jerking off about muh day of the rope while Muhammad fucks their wife and Juan takes their job at least gives them some petty moral satisfaction that everyone else is as shit as they are.

"

2018-01-15 02:20:01 UTC  

"

2018-01-15 02:20:05 UTC  

Accelerationists are the biggest blue pilled cucks.
There is zero proof that it would work, which it wouldn't if you spent even 2 seconds pondering the fact. There are only 2 possible outcomes of importing a shit ton of niggers and arabs will result. Either the eventual mixing and genociding of all whites or the much less likely outcome our successors in the future eventually driving the shitskins out with violence but the damage would be done and the shitskins would have left their genetic mark on our people just like with southern europeans.
If your a nationalist and your advocating that we fix our problems by opening our borders because muh acceleration of muh collapse, you deserve the rope.

"