they just don't get the American character

the globalists could co-opt drone technology

I like this place, I want to make it better

many in the U.S. Military might be sympathetic to the right, but many of them will simply not fight for ethno nationalist causes BECAUSE MANY OF THEM ARE MINORITIES

Jesus, these people actually do think this is the Turner Diaries

holy shit

yeah, are you reading through the 4plebs archive I linked?

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 Yeah definitely.

So in that way Hillary Clinton would've been way better for Republicans because they would be in the House and Senate

these fucking LARPers think winning a civil war will be just like the vidya gaems

there is a very, very, very small fraction of the population who would be willing to tolerate war on American soil

they don't get pragmatism and getting to where you want to be steadily

Do /pol/fags actually believe in shit like white nationalism, the Jewish Question, etc. or is it just a meme

remember that EVERY SINGLE WAR since the Civil War has been OFF American soil

if total collapse happens, how do these faggots know that people won't be clamoring for communism?

I mean, if it comes to having the guns taken, I'll fight, but I'm not going to fucking cross my fingers for it

there are many people who would rather have communism than starvation and bullets

yeah, I'd fight too

but I'd rather use my fucking brains and persuasive skills

if it came down to a fight, it would boil down to random chance

@Snickers yeah, there's a nugget of truth in it, but the thing is a lot of them go way too far with it

some retard could get lucky and shoot me in the head

or I could win a battle with my side, only to have us all killed instantly by a drone strike

someone like Jared Taylor is much more appealing than this accelerationist idiocy

Right, but are most of them legitimately pushing for a white ethnostate, questioning how Jews run everything, etc. or are they just LARPing for whatever reason

it's hard to tell who is LARPing and who isn't

however, I would bet that the kinds of posters who go "hurr instead of voting in the midterms, just take up arms and start a race war instead" are larpers or shills looking to get people in trouble

Trump's approval in the most vulnerable districts:

Competitive Republican House Seats: 15
1. Arizona-2 (42%)/California-25 (36%)/New Jersey-2 (45%)
2. California-39 (41%)
3. California-48 (50%)
4. California-49 (45%)
5. Colorado-6 (37%)
6. Florida-26 (41%)
7. Florida-27 (48%)
8. Minnesota-2 (42%)
9. Nebraska-2 (43%)
10. New York-19 (35%)
11. New York-22 (41%)
12. Texas-7 (41%)
13. Texas-23 (37%)
14. Virginia-10 (46%)
15. Washington-8 (33%)

I'm pushing to make the demographics better too, I'm not blind, but as for ethnostates where there's strict rules for who is allowed to stay and who gets deported isn't going to realistically happen

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 This begs the question...how do we know these polls are sampled properly?

I'd say pushing family values back onto families, and having an immigration system similar to pre-'65 is how I'd put us back on track

in the Alabama election, there was a poll right before that said Jones would win by 10% (far from it) and another that said Moore would win by 10% (nope)

I wouldn't trust polls since they can be very ambiguous.

@FLanon yeah, that makes much more sense than "hurr, let's import the entire third world...and then we're GUARANTEED to win!"

data's better than no data, that's how I see it

yeah, but the question is...how do you use data to make decisions ?

whether or not Trump is popular in those districts, we still need to put as much effort in as possible

now, you could argue that we should ignore safe red and safe blue areas

that's true

but it's hard to tell what's truly 'safe'