Message from @skankd

Discord ID: 402589354360438825


2018-01-15 02:56:53 UTC  

what is the sauce btw

2018-01-15 02:58:02 UTC  

i collaborated the data myself

2018-01-15 02:58:11 UTC  

ah ok

2018-01-15 02:59:02 UTC  

it's probably better than most polls

2018-01-15 02:59:28 UTC  

the betting percentages had to come from somewhere though, right?

2018-01-15 03:06:29 UTC  

+3.6% in the last week

2018-01-15 03:06:32 UTC  

so that's good

2018-01-15 03:11:15 UTC  

good night guys

2018-01-15 04:12:17 UTC  

should we get Bradly Manning the nomination just to fuck up the Dems chances in that election?

2018-01-15 14:32:41 UTC  

yeah

2018-01-15 14:33:23 UTC  

probably would be the best chance of getting that seat in a state that is extremely blue

2018-01-15 15:52:11 UTC  

lol at this post

2018-01-15 22:08:21 UTC  

new thread goys

2018-01-15 22:08:24 UTC  

keep this bumped

2018-01-15 22:15:37 UTC  

kk

2018-01-15 22:26:21 UTC  

half tempted to write a quick site for this stuff, like that guy did with the tax calculator

2018-01-15 23:27:50 UTC  

>tfw I don't think that Chelsea Manning isn't necessarily a bad choice for the US Senate

2018-01-15 23:28:19 UTC  

I think* whelp

2018-01-15 23:28:57 UTC  

I saw an article stating that some of the more centrist dem are bashing it/her

2018-01-15 23:29:22 UTC  

She will prob lose real hard is she runs

2018-01-15 23:29:30 UTC  

Yeah. Most of the Democratic establishment is shilling against her hard.

2018-01-15 23:30:11 UTC  

Even if she wins or loses, as long as she exposes the corrupt elite agenda of the surveillance state, the war crimes committed by the US, etc. I'd say its a win

2018-01-15 23:32:43 UTC  

But realistically speaking, she's going to probably lose to Cardin anyways

2018-01-15 23:34:27 UTC  

It's hard to say, especially with social justice and girl power on every leftie's tongue. Though, its hard to say what the population of Leftist millenial sjw types is in Maryland.

2018-01-16 00:27:51 UTC  

So I've researched and found some projections for the house that are fairly whitepilling

2018-01-16 00:28:04 UTC  

Nice

2018-01-16 00:28:10 UTC  

thanks for the good work

2018-01-16 00:28:13 UTC  

they're from fairvote, a pretty accurate firm from what I've found

2018-01-16 00:30:08 UTC  

basically, the high confidence projections they have (which from past analyses they've accurately predicted 99.7% of, so it's extremely likely they'll get all of them right bar one or two at most) has 205 R seats and 163 D seats

2018-01-16 00:31:05 UTC  

this gives a field of about 63 seats in competition

2018-01-16 00:32:20 UTC  

218 seats are needed to have a majority, meaning Rs would need to grab at least 13 seats out of the 63 in play in order to keep the house

2018-01-16 00:32:51 UTC  

obviously we want much more than this for legislative purposes, but this effectively prevents any impeachment attempts

2018-01-16 00:34:37 UTC  

Now, if there's a 2006-esque "blue wave" with a similar makeup to that year, w/ 54% dems and 46% Rs, that still gives Rs a majority of 226 seats, at least according to FairVote

2018-01-16 00:35:55 UTC  

this is about 52% of the House of Representatives which would be Republican, or to give a frame of reference, about the same margin that we had in the senate before Moore's loss