you asked for other proff outside the bible, and i dont usually argue from outside the bible

so youre making a strawman

<:oof:485078292723138572>

He asked if you can prove it without the Bible, all you had to do was say no

i told him about chariots at the bottom of the red sea

he chose to dismiss that which is okay

I thought this was a one on one debate Fluff

*because it has been disproven as simple coral growths*

I'm just saying this wasn't a strawman

@Soldz (CF) nah

No double teaming

No debate is one on one in any debate channels

the strawman was asking for proof outside the bible then trying to destroy the proof given

anything not found in the bible is open to corruption

i dont like leaving the safety of the bible

Damn the bias

<:ohheck:485078351162376202>

When you put it that way it sounds pretty bad

yeah, cause the bible has never been interpreted differently by anyone

or translated differntly

the bible is the same message

gods word is alive and active bro

the words can have different meaning

Actually brother of the church I disagree

if i can change the meaning of a word, that is corruption of it

If everyone sees the message different then there is no right or wrong

the holy spirit is able to teach different things from the same scripture

lol wat

Then whats the point

Bible can't be corrupted but everything else outside of it can

Gotcha

like, i can use the bible to support slavery, but i can also use it to condone slavery

The holy spirit is running everyone up the wall then

the bible doesnt condone slavery

Yikes

i didnt say it did

i said you can use it to condone slavery

He isnt wrong

Everyone has a different point of view on the message

Apparently

He's correct the Bible even gives instructions on how to punish slaves