where is your next piece moving to?

linguistic chess =]

i was being specific

My piece moves to Bible can be used to condone slavery and hence can very easily be corrupted

Richest deepest most southern whitest men

rich white men in the deep south had the majority of slaves

Southernest* @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS

Piss

:P

if you only use eisogesis, its possible to get a false understanding of scripture

that it supported slavery?

yeah how dare i think that is wrong

lol

I mean when Bible tells us to "you may purchase slaves" I can really get to any other meaning

eisogesis is like taking youre ideas and bouncing them off of scriptures

You can also use the Bible to say the earth is 6000 years old and is flat

so, we should have slaves is what you are saying

You impose your own morals on scripture

eisogesis should line up with exegesis

Death of the author but the author is God

also, sorry a 2000 year old book cant keep up with how society changes

Eh the holy spirit can just rewrite it

Im up for white slaves

No

cause 2000 years ago, no one saw a problem with owning slaves. Guess what times change

now we do

slavery is not okay

Do we? :3

Aw

yes, and the bible puts a system in place to support slavery

support slavery with the bible for me

id like to see

if it was against slavery, it would say dont own slaves. Not regulate slavery

@Derek Nelson your fellow Christian might disagree with you on that, he has expressed biblical slavery is fine in his opinions

Seriously?

[Exodus 21]]

This preacher is a racist bigot?

[Exodus 21]

He is not racist

fuck

Cant trust no christians damn