>>ban @Souls threats

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned @Souls

God is never dead... He is very alive and right in front of you... hopefully one day inside and part of you

i'm really sorry to disappoint you but those were god's last words to me

@red if you wish to troll and have nothing serious to say I can find a different place for you here

im sorry mr z

Dude, I never brought up Carbon dating. Even the paleontologists digging up these fossilsa didn't use carbon dating

And what do you mean DNA isn't verifiable?

We use DNA evidence for forensics!

Its used to solve crimes and is accepted by the court, Id say thats pretty "verifiable"

Look dude you're just shoving off every piece of evidence

sure you do.

😂

you say we like you found this stuff and dated it

Try to understand this:
Carbon dating is not used to date these fossils, different radioactive isotopes are used.

And the only thing funny here is how you avoid answering me or avoid to recute what i say

try to understand this:

you dont know shit. its all lies. evolutution is a crock of shit and i have proof your theory cant be true. ill post it tomorrow.

gnite

Gnite mate

And hopefully maybe tomorrow you might be able to refute the stuff I said too

Well

There are direct proofs of evolution

But okay

And yes, we know DNA is real

It's funny how I worked with DNA once

We multiplied the DNA with the PCR method

Which is also used in forensics to have more DNA material

Also, carbon dating IS a reliable way to determine the age of organic material

Because we KNOW that things that breathe have a constant C-14 in and outtake

And since we know that c-14 is falling apart because it is slightly radioactive and we know the rate it in which it is falling apart we can calculate the age of something

these numbskulls missed the Lloyd Pye video, and..everything else (scroll up, kiddies) <:lul:484994724118134784> _smh_ ..

The earth was made flat and has always been flat. It can’t just change shape magically

It can’t turn from flat to spherical

Why should it always have been flat? @wooflesthedog#1687

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ ?

you cant just argue that creation is right by the complexity of the human body

thats not how proof works

you need physical data

that correlates to your argument

that's the point of evolution. macro molecules develop first. these are molecules that can replicate themselves with materials around them and no form of consciousness or sentience. then these eventually produce organelle or what we would now call organelle anyway (as organelle - except for the nucleus - were separate species iirc) now these organelle will interact with each other by pure chance and eventually these will form single celled organisms which can photosynthesise (and some of these cells start to form plants) which slowly created an atmosphere that could support animal life. now a lot of these macro molecules remain as they won't all end up as organelle. now some plants begin to evolve shrinking the vacuole and reducing the cell wall's thickness. this combined with the absorption of mitochondria, which was its own species, now this meant that it just needed a source of glucose to evolve away from having chloroplasts so eventually these random interactions will form a single cell organism which can consume part of a plant or other cells to access glucose and there is oxygen in the air so it can now evolve to remove chloroplasts as it no longer needs them. now these would be evolving in many areas around the earth (whether you think it's curved or round) so they can now begin evolving even further becoming multicell organisms which then begins to develop a food chain. this brought around dinosaurs which were eventually subject to mass extinction. then complex life begins to evolve again from those that survived and single celled organisms once again which eventually creates *homo sapiens* and all of the other species that we see today