Message from @Credibly Charted
Discord ID: 568986941073129492
I don't think anybody denies adaptation. Lots of creationists even accept species changes.
Such as Ken Ham.
It's new "kinds" (whatever that means) that they want to see directly.
Is the thing about evolution like how humans evolved from apes and whatnot?
Yeah
Makes sense
What made these species?
It tells you in the articles.
Environmental pressures trigger natural selection. The tuskless elephants had an advantage because poachers wouldn't want to hunt them. The algae went multicellular because paramecia were hunting them. It's a lot easier to survive the onslaught when you've got many cells than when you've got only one.
What made the environmental pressures
What designed the life
@Credibly Charted it is called adapting
@Ivan Pavlovich wouldn’t we be able to see the in between stages of evolution to be able to prove it
@Depression2405 Eehhhhhhh.... It would support large-scale evolution, but it wouldn't prove it. I may be nitpicking here, but *all* adaptations fall under "evolution". It's just that when people hear "evolution", they think of large-scale changes. So, those changes you see do prove evolution because they *are* evolution, but you really can't extrapolate that to large-scale changes without more evidence.
As for Citizen's questions, 1. The environmental pressures came from nature. Some are applied by humans, some by predators, and others are just consequences of local conditions. 2. Who says life was designed?
@Citizen Z Nothing "made" them
The things just adapted to things they were surrounded with
Nothing?
Whats nothing?
So wait @Ivan Pavlovich even if there was small changes you would see something, for an example, between a man and an ape at some point in the present or something leading to it or even possibly in the past there would be proof of a thing between man and ape; but no one has ever found such proof. This is why Darwin himself said that his theory of evolution was false.
But do you believe it
The evidence proves it so it isn't something to believe but either be ignorant of or acknowledge it @Depression2405
Alright, @yeeet the Savior has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
cc
CFC
Cc
C
X
@Citizen Z With saying nothing I was trying to say that it was not spesifically designed to be an eviromental pressure
Creation
@Depression2405 Let me start with the last thing you said. Darwin *never* recanted. That's a myth, and even creationists have started admitting it. From "creation.com": "It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people." https://creation.com/did-charles-darwin-recant
As for "missing links", I'd advise you to do some more reading on your own, since I'm not knowledgeable on this subject, but I think that with the new addition of *H. Luzonensis* there are now at least 6 extinct species within the genus *Homo*. I might be forgetting some, but whatever.
there was no creation, a person just popped into existence you fat tards
🐒 👽 <:nasalies:485141702403686403>
Wooooow
What a nice argument man
guys
Jesus exists