Message from @Citizen Z

Discord ID: 557591930729529346


2019-03-19 13:37:56 UTC  

No it does

2019-03-19 13:38:33 UTC  

To lazy to crop but here

2019-03-19 13:38:45 UTC  

NVM cant post pics

2019-03-19 13:39:03 UTC  

Learn something

2019-03-19 13:39:13 UTC  

2019-03-19 15:44:03 UTC  

oh boy is that an *interesting* article. so CO2 is proven to be linked to retaining heat in a body such as the earth and currently we should be going through a period of global cooling. if we should be going through a period of global cooling then (while there would be loss of polar ice in areas) there would be gain in the amount of polar ice. we are loosing polar ice and we are seeing sea levels rise because of it. desertification is, while a natural process, massively accelerated and CO2 is linked with lowering intelligence via less oxygen being able to reach you overall especially in enclosed environments which typically have high CO2 concentration than outside. so less oxygen reaches your brain and thus begins inhibiting thought processes and reasoning as you can't function at full capacity and in high concentrations of CO2 you will just die so please do tell me how it's not a poison and even if climate change was a hoax how CO2 isn't dangerous

2019-03-19 15:47:07 UTC  

Assumption based on belief

2019-03-19 15:47:35 UTC  

The c02 is .04%

2019-03-19 15:47:58 UTC  

Thr human body can tolerate up to 1% with zero effect

2019-03-19 15:48:23 UTC  

You have been Indoctrinated

2019-03-19 15:48:46 UTC  

Sea levels rise and fall

2019-03-19 15:49:00 UTC  

Has nothing to do with us

2019-03-19 15:49:17 UTC  

The sun is what drives the climate

2019-03-19 15:49:52 UTC  

C02 is good

2019-03-19 15:50:01 UTC  

Im hoping for a 50% increase

2019-03-19 15:50:12 UTC  

.04 to .06%

2019-03-19 15:50:28 UTC  

assumption based on belief? what's that meant to mean? that i'm blindly believing something? well as someone who has seen the effects of CO2 concentration that low in an enclosed box with a thermometer in and watched it heat i'm assuming on belief? and as someone who has been inside a room that i can verify was filling slowly with CO2 as i was the one who made the reaction to slowly fill it and watched my cognitive abilities slowly decline before my very eyes as CO2 reached 0.06% in the room is blind belief?

2019-03-19 15:50:58 UTC  

Data?

2019-03-19 15:51:05 UTC  

Experiment study

2019-03-19 15:51:15 UTC  

Lets see it

2019-03-19 15:51:20 UTC  

idk the exact numbers but i've got a book somewhere that i recorded the stuff into

2019-03-19 15:53:39 UTC  

K well you dont know what you are talking about

2019-03-19 15:53:43 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551433518991933442/557592548521279508/Screenshot_20190319-085207_Chrome.jpg

2019-03-19 15:53:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/551433518991933442/557592570079739925/Screenshot_20190319-085314_Chrome.jpg

2019-03-19 15:54:29 UTC  

We are well be the threshold of hypercapnia

2019-03-19 15:54:31 UTC  

i'd need sm time to find it but i have it somewhere. and basically i concentrated a small box with CO2 by complete combustion up to 0.04% then applied radiation to mimic the sun at a proportional amount. i also did this with a box that had 0.02% CO2 inside of it (same size of box) and heated that for the same length of time. at the end of this the temperature inside of the box with 0.04% it was significantly high. again i don't have the results with me as it was maybe a year ago but idk where the book is

2019-03-19 15:54:41 UTC  

so that's in support of climate change

2019-03-19 15:54:44 UTC  

You don't need to find anything

2019-03-19 15:54:51 UTC  

I just showed you

2019-03-19 15:55:02 UTC  

The c02 levels are fine

2019-03-19 15:55:11 UTC  

We can handle many more times

2019-03-19 15:55:38 UTC  

Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by greedy and corrupted politicians

2019-03-19 15:55:56 UTC  

Did you even read the article i posted?

2019-03-19 15:57:48 UTC  

Do you understand the difference between .04 and 1 ?

2019-03-19 15:58:12 UTC  

4 out of 100

2019-03-19 15:59:17 UTC  

so the following test had me sat in a box 5m by 5m by 5m and i had set up a point where CO2 would be filtered in by a combustion reaction in an open system separate of the box. i was in there for 30 minutes doing the following: solving equations, solving simultaneous equations and factorisation. i timed how long each question took each one was as difficult as the one before. during this time measurements of CO2 were taken by how much was entering the box per minute and by 0.07% i had noticed about 5 seconds increase in time taken to solve the problems on average. by 0.1% it had increased by at least 10 seconds and my mind was beginning to feel foggy and i lethargic. i continued to .15% at which point i had to leave as i was on the verge of passing out

2019-03-19 15:59:43 UTC  

i fully well understand the difference between 0.04 and 1

2019-03-19 15:59:48 UTC  

The earth isnt 5m by 5m

2019-03-19 16:00:04 UTC  

no but the proportion of concentration means that it doesn't matter

2019-03-19 16:00:08 UTC  

Show me the experiment and accompanying data