Message from @Koro

Discord ID: 557598462745772043


2019-03-19 16:11:44 UTC  

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

2019-03-19 16:11:52 UTC  

ok so when i get that data out and drop it, which is a precise record of what happened, which were designed to disprove climate change is more than slightly wrong?

2019-03-19 16:12:01 UTC  

i'm no persistent debate troll

2019-03-19 16:12:05 UTC  

ik what the hell i'm talking about

2019-03-19 16:12:09 UTC  

Show the data

2019-03-19 16:12:20 UTC  

Co2 is .04%. We can handle 1% without any detectable limitations
Disprove me.

2019-03-19 16:12:28 UTC  

Lol

2019-03-19 16:12:35 UTC  

again how many times do i have to say this to you? it's locked in the attic and i don't have a key

2019-03-19 16:12:45 UTC  

Co2 is making earth green. Disprove me

2019-03-19 16:12:51 UTC  

honestly ur starting to sound more like a persistent debate troll than me here

2019-03-19 16:13:13 UTC  

CO2 would be going down or staying the same if it was making the earth green as more plants would be absorbing it

2019-03-19 16:13:35 UTC  

If you lowered co2 by 20%. The forests wouldnt grow back fast enough for our consumption based off current levels of deforestation. Disprove me.

2019-03-19 16:14:13 UTC  

Increased co2 helps plants which helps us

2019-03-19 16:14:28 UTC  

so deforestation is happening faster than trees are growing back especially in rainforests so they're not growing back fast enough anyway so how is the earth becoming more green

2019-03-19 16:14:52 UTC  

if the level of CO2 was lowered by 20% there would be no chance that they could grow back is true

2019-03-19 16:15:16 UTC  

More co2 means less disease, less water consumption needed. Healthier, bigger crops.

2019-03-19 16:15:42 UTC  

We need a 50% increase

2019-03-19 16:16:17 UTC  

hold on a second, how is less water consumption needed? if a plant is photosynthesising then it needs one mole of water to one mole of CO2 so it definitely would not need less water by any means. and how is it going to cause less disease?

2019-03-19 16:16:41 UTC  

*6 moles of water to 6 moles of CO2

2019-03-19 16:16:44 UTC  

More co2 means trees and plants will grow in more arid regions

2019-03-19 16:17:13 UTC  

ok so why are we seeing accelerated desertification instead of more vegetation in arid and semi arid regions?

2019-03-19 16:18:02 UTC  

There is some other things as well but i think your mind is closed so you wont even bother looking into it. So i wont mention it.

2019-03-19 16:18:25 UTC  

ok so as someone who tried to disprove climate change you'r telling me that my mind is closed?

2019-03-19 16:18:29 UTC  

@Koro we are not seeing desertification. We are seeing a greening earth

2019-03-19 16:18:41 UTC  

i think i'm actually talking to a debate troll

2019-03-19 16:19:38 UTC  

so the fact that india in its entirety is at risk of desertification is us not seeing desertification? and the masses of deforestation and less growth in arid and semi arid regions is a greening earth?

2019-03-19 16:19:53 UTC  

Show me your data.

2019-03-19 16:20:05 UTC  

Ok. Show me the data of your experiment from someone else

2019-03-19 16:20:07 UTC  

Show me how you know earth is becoming greener and not unhealthier.

2019-03-19 16:20:18 UTC  

I don’t have any data to show, I’m not the one making arguments.

2019-03-19 16:20:18 UTC  

Plant a seed

2019-03-19 16:20:27 UTC  

Watch the weeds spread

2019-03-19 16:20:33 UTC  

Watch the grass grow

2019-03-19 16:20:52 UTC  

If you actually think that is going to do anything to Earth, you are extremely stupid sir.

2019-03-19 16:21:05 UTC  

Plus, that isn’t even data.

2019-03-19 16:21:10 UTC  

That’s just stupid blabber.

2019-03-19 16:21:35 UTC  

if i plant a seed in the uk and a seed of the same species in the middle of mali are they going to do the same thing? no

2019-03-19 16:22:01 UTC  

i can't attach images here so i can't show u the picture

2019-03-19 16:22:13 UTC  

From your Oracle.

2019-03-19 16:23:23 UTC  

so the majority of that is going to be agriculture which is harvested only for the CO2 to be released once again. how much of that is there to stay for a long enough period to matter?